Re: Optimal OSD count for SSDs / NVMe disks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 03.02.2016 um 17:24 schrieb Wade Holler:
> AFAIK when using XFS, parallel write as you described is not enabled.
Not sure I'm getting this. If I have multiple OSDs on the same NVMe
(separated by different data-partitions) I have multiple parallel writes
(one "stream" per OSD), or am I mistaken?

> Regardless in a way though the NVMe drives are so fast it shouldn't
> matter much the partitioned journal or other choice.
Thanks, does anyone has benchmarks on this. How about the size of the
journal?

> What I would be more interested in is you replication size on the cache
> pool.
> 
> This might sound crazy but if your KVM instances are really that short
> lived, could you get away with size=2 on the cache pool from and
> availability perspective ?
:) We are already on min_size=1, size=2 - we even ran for a while witz
min_size=1, size=1, so we cannot squeeze out much more on that end.

Greetings
-Sascha-

PS: Thanks a lot already for all the answers!
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux