ceph random read performance is better than sequential read?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: ceph random read performance is better than sequential read?
From: min fang <louisfang2013@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 20:28:17 +0800

Hi, I did a fio testing on my ceph cluster, and found ceph random read performance is better than sequential read. Is it true in your stand?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ceph random read performance is better than sequential read?
  - From: Wade Holler

Prev by Date: Re: CephFS is not maintianing conistency
Next by Date: Re: CephFS is not maintianing conistency
Previous by thread: Ceph osd portable question
Next by thread: Re: ceph random read performance is better than sequential read?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux