-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Currently set as DNM. :( I guess the author has not updated the PR as requested. If needed, I can probably submit a new PR as we would really like to see this in the next Hammer release. I just need to know if I need to get involved. I don't want to take credit for Nick's work, so I've been waiting. Thanks - ---------------- Robert LeBlanc PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Nick Fisk wrote: > Looks like it has been done > > https://github.com/zhouyuan/ceph/commit/f352b8b908e8788d053cbe15fa3632b226a6758d > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >> Sent: 08 January 2016 18:23 >> To: Nick Fisk >> Cc: Wade Holler ; hnuzhoulin >> ; Ceph-User >> Subject: Re: using cache-tier with writeback mode, raods bench >> result degrade >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Are you backporting that to hammer? We'd love it. >> - ---------------- >> Robert LeBlanc >> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1 >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Nick Fisk wrote: >> > There was/is a bug in Infernalis and older, where objects will always get >> promoted on the 2nd read/write regardless of what you set the >> min_recency_promote settings to. This can have a dramatic effect on >> performance. I wonder if this is what you are experiencing? >> > >> > This has been fixed in Jewel https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6702 . >> > >> > You can compile the changes above to see if it helps or I have a .deb for >> Infernalis where this is fixed if it's easier. >> > >> > Nick >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf >> >> Of Wade Holler >> >> Sent: 08 January 2016 16:14 >> >> To: hnuzhoulin ; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxx >> >> Subject: Re: using cache-tier with writeback mode, raods >> >> bench result degrade >> >> >> >> My experience is performance degrades dramatically when dirty objects >> >> are flushed. >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Wade >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:08 AM hnuzhoulin wrote: >> >> Hi,guyes >> >> Recentlly,I am testing cache-tier using writeback mode.but I found a >> >> strange things. >> >> the performance using rados bench degrade.Is it correct? >> >> If so,how to explain.following some info about my test: >> >> >> >> storage node:4 machine,two INTEL SSDSC2BB120G4(one for systaem,the >> >> other one used as OSD),four sata as OSD. >> >> >> >> before using cache-tier: >> >> root@ceph1:~# rados bench -p coldstorage 300 write --no-cleanup >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Total time run: 301.236355 >> >> Total writes made: 6041 >> >> Write size: 4194304 >> >> Bandwidth (MB/sec): 80.216 >> >> >> >> Stddev Bandwidth: 10.5358 >> >> Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 104 >> >> Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0 >> >> Average Latency: 0.797838 >> >> Stddev Latency: 0.619098 >> >> Max latency: 4.89823 >> >> Min latency: 0.158543 >> >> >> >> root@ceph1:/root/cluster# rados bench -p coldstorage 300 seq >> >> Total time run: 133.563980 >> >> Total reads made: 6041 >> >> Read size: 4194304 >> >> Bandwidth (MB/sec): 180.917 >> >> >> >> Average Latency: 0.353559 >> >> Max latency: 1.83356 >> >> Min latency: 0.027878 >> >> >> >> after configure cache-tier: >> >> root@ubuntu:~/benchmarkcollect/Monitor# ceph osd tier add >> coldstorage >> >> hotstorage pool 'hotstorage' is now (or already was) a tier of >> >> 'coldstorage' >> >> >> >> root@ubuntu:~/benchmarkcollect/Monitor# ceph osd tier cache-mode >> >> hotstorage writeback set cache-mode for pool 'hotstorage' to >> >> writeback >> >> >> >> root@ubuntu:~/benchmarkcollect/Monitor# ceph osd tier set-overlay >> >> coldstorage hotstorage overlay for 'coldstorage' is now (or already >> >> was) 'hotstorage' >> >> >> >> oot@ubuntu:~# ceph osd dump|grep storage pool 6 'coldstorage' >> >> replicated size 3 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 0 object_hash rjenkins >> >> pg_num 512 pgp_num 512 last_change 216 lfor 216 flags hashpspool >> >> tiers 7 read_tier 7 write_tier 7 stripe_width 0 pool 7 'hotstorage' >> >> replicated size 3 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 1 object_hash rjenkins >> >> pg_num 128 pgp_num 128 last_change 228 flags >> >> hashpspool,incomplete_clones tier_of 6 cache_mode writeback >> >> target_bytes >> >> 100000000000 hit_set bloom{false_positive_probability: 0.05, target_size: >> >> 0, seed: 0} 3600s x6 stripe_width 0 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> rados bench -p coldstorage 300 write --no-cleanup Total time run: >> >> 302.207573 Total writes made: 4315 Write size: 4194304 Bandwidth >> >> (MB/sec): 57.113 >> >> >> >> Stddev Bandwidth: 23.9375 >> >> Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 104 >> >> Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0 >> >> Average Latency: 1.1204 >> >> Stddev Latency: 0.717092 >> >> Max latency: 6.97288 >> >> Min latency: 0.158371 >> >> >> >> root@ubuntu:/# rados bench -p coldstorage 300 seq Total time run: >> >> 153.869741 Total reads made: 4315 Read size: 4194304 Bandwidth >> >> (MB/sec): 112.173 >> >> >> >> Average Latency: 0.570487 >> >> Max latency: 1.75137 >> >> Min latency: 0.039635 >> >> >> >> >> >> ceph.conf: >> >> -------------------------------------------- >> >> [global] >> >> fsid = 4ec1eb64-226c-4d90-8c5c-b6b6644be831 >> >> mon_initial_members = ceph2, ceph3, ceph4 mon_host = >> >> 10.**.**.241,10.**.**.242,10.**.**.243 >> >> auth_cluster_required = cephx >> >> auth_service_required = cephx >> >> auth_client_required = cephx >> >> filestore_xattr_use_omap = true >> >> osd_pool_default_size = 3 >> >> osd_pool_default_min_size = 1 >> >> auth_supported = cephx >> >> osd_journal_size = 10240 >> >> osd_mkfs_type = xfs >> >> osd crush update on start = false >> >> >> >> [client] >> >> rbd_cache = true >> >> rbd_cache_writethrough_until_flush = false rbd_cache_size = 33554432 >> >> rbd_cache_max_dirty = 25165824 rbd_cache_target_dirty = 16777216 >> >> rbd_cache_max_dirty_age = 1 rbd_cache_block_writes_upfront = false >> >> [osd] filestore_omap_header_cache_size = 40000 >> >> filestore_fd_cache_size = 40000 filestore_fiemap = true >> >> client_readahead_min = 2097152 client_readahead_max_bytes = 0 >> >> client_readahead_max_periods = 4 filestore_journal_writeahead = false >> >> filestore_max_sync_interval = 10 filestore_queue_max_ops = 500 >> >> filestore_queue_max_bytes = 1048576000 >> >> filestore_queue_committing_max_ops = 5000 >> >> filestore_queue_committing_max_bytes = 1048576000 >> >> keyvaluestore_queue_max_ops = 500 keyvaluestore_queue_max_bytes >> = >> >> 1048576000 journal_queue_max_ops = 30000 journal_queue_max_bytes >> = >> >> 3355443200 osd_op_threads = 20 osd_disk_threads = 8 >> >> filestore_op_threads = 4 osd_mount_options_xfs = >> >> rw,noatime,nobarrier,inode64,logbsize=256k,delaylog >> >> >> >> [mon] >> >> mon_osd_allow_primary_affinity=true >> >> >> >> -- >> >> 使用Opera的电子邮件客户端:http://www.opera.com/mail/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> ceph-users mailing list >> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list >> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: Mailvelope v1.3.3 >> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com >> >> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWj/52CRDmVDuy+mK58QAAI1UP/jDBE95QirkgybKwOS5 >> V >> fpCn+9tAk3psAkVEg3f9XdXtr2et0XSRiZ2Nce20Dj8OFsLcvNLuDXNEzwVH >> DLJTmQIvxyEFliXZyW+Tp1aumQylhlWMT/4zgc8H1YUxo0EBaYG8xXsItTBx >> DRHykhYPokn0lJxYBpqM6YyiTvAh1OsPL8fwDZaSan5uIaPD7VnbXmoYdkI3 >> jJ2TosK7qANlHCeDu2u4Ppc3Re3cA0+cCcf15vGabNe3yGbA+k1GvKLFgLLV >> zuveqUdxfkDQuTRoepZo44nLVkTnsbQrrTyR2cYJxEI+p2UHh6gO0gzK4VOC >> nR6/rhnw6ZEXOlVR4pU1Gc854D+yZx1u+VLDEO1Z8FBquRtfiReOj9qvnarM >> PwuVSstLmL5Z9hOJ3+fL1ZGvBn+W8lO7SUurdi4IKGkuRygX7OrCvGkOVuzq >> SxHce5u79GIRyIHT7SIeX2gLMTu1ox+ThM9S9iyAtUzVxHMA6qcOe1KzS0dR >> hnG5K68bE3i7ynwYa6U5MGTTxZKX6oQn6FZ58jBZeAejacPVRT954YdbKMEJ >> bN1qCuCrSTa8sufGNltb64y+crYBUQlGjvU78I0PcjfVIYH5irxc6qVGdzB1 >> eUqsz8tWaQPDCYAsG661YmSHf1fghNs8BpDST0u5uItvcIQ8BMeqwWeA+eED >> Cpzq >> =4mWK >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Mailvelope v1.3.3 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWlBTZCRDmVDuy+mK58QAA3y8QAJt7vw5t3WcaGRu3GCl0 26B+OvEd1rCbcg3D+s9FJTvdFdJraji/u7NFoK4Iw1tKKcpPYYsBqKr9G4d7 rl/0Q9hIuSiUO1CSdzUSjmGFZCxaV2jzqY7eBtJkhHcnjaE0HsLb7y7GwFWz DWwBtjnK4lE9DH0OZvFFZzHeL/S2PI/PimhxS9lrQ7BaRMXngoee6GXHH4BR 38ExG94DFHnZR5rMhw5d7djpCcmAwF5IK2oH1ZaAO9MQwEEwE6wH5TMjPHsN mNPpflmcU87pOZbKh6aG/takp36dtvkdjpPPm6rNxjYBlQB1qIrLyH0vU5at JAMJ+FbtdAIS5cqaOi1Bcd8lLRe8Z4p4TEiUz4LalOOynPJRyegG38P2W3Y4 fxUqBrFCJ/T6sFcVj8he5yJbAxFf5jXibHyeSo6Johv2JHl8Leld2QyEbt8U b6lcx/aD2whC5CPZF1rqyqXOXSmK50ajbmTGTsvcUK/FfgUoQp3GW1lHXui1 mmn6yFhA4pa7xSarSLsZSZkcfZ+Cc4TgcuOkfX8zD7fDSQjZLgB3bFoHMNfF FUPN67V5gLS2EovwdIxQRWjYoqefDfKMFTR9McM3FYV/9OCSYtplUWbJDuQI ZQiLYuQNptC+PJcwu46dwt3jeOoaPCrttigtYL83ZA3cs9Z9240IJTUZFlJo MIGZ =EvoI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com