Re: using cache-tier with writeback mode, raods bench result degrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Currently set as DNM. :( I guess the author has not updated the PR as
requested. If needed, I can probably submit a new PR as we would
really like to see this in the next Hammer release. I just need to
know if I need to get involved. I don't want to take credit for Nick's
work, so I've been waiting.

Thanks
- ----------------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1


On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Nick Fisk  wrote:
> Looks like it has been done
>
> https://github.com/zhouyuan/ceph/commit/f352b8b908e8788d053cbe15fa3632b226a6758d
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Robert LeBlanc [mailto:robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: 08 January 2016 18:23
>> To: Nick Fisk
>> Cc: Wade Holler ; hnuzhoulin
>> ; Ceph-User
>> Subject: Re:  using cache-tier with writeback mode, raods bench
>> result degrade
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA256
>>
>> Are you backporting that to hammer? We'd love it.
>> - ----------------
>> Robert LeBlanc
>> PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Nick Fisk  wrote:
>> > There was/is a bug in Infernalis and older, where objects will always get
>> promoted on the 2nd read/write regardless of what you set the
>> min_recency_promote settings to. This can have a dramatic effect on
>> performance. I wonder if this is what you are experiencing?
>> >
>> > This has been fixed in Jewel https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/6702 .
>> >
>> > You can compile the changes above to see if it helps or I have a .deb for
>> Infernalis where this is fixed if it's easier.
>> >
>> > Nick
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>> >> Of Wade Holler
>> >> Sent: 08 January 2016 16:14
>> >> To: hnuzhoulin ; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxx
>> >> Subject: Re:  using cache-tier with writeback mode, raods
>> >> bench result degrade
>> >>
>> >> My experience is performance degrades dramatically when dirty objects
>> >> are flushed.
>> >>
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Wade
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 11:08 AM hnuzhoulin  wrote:
>> >> Hi,guyes
>> >> Recentlly,I am testing  cache-tier using writeback mode.but I found a
>> >> strange things.
>> >> the performance  using rados bench degrade.Is it correct?
>> >> If so,how to explain.following some info about my test:
>> >>
>> >> storage node:4 machine,two INTEL SSDSC2BB120G4(one for systaem,the
>> >> other one used as OSD),four sata as OSD.
>> >>
>> >> before using cache-tier:
>> >> root@ceph1:~# rados bench -p coldstorage 300 write --no-cleanup
>> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Total time run:         301.236355
>> >> Total writes made:      6041
>> >> Write size:             4194304
>> >> Bandwidth (MB/sec):     80.216
>> >>
>> >> Stddev Bandwidth:       10.5358
>> >> Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 104
>> >> Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0
>> >> Average Latency:        0.797838
>> >> Stddev Latency:         0.619098
>> >> Max latency:            4.89823
>> >> Min latency:            0.158543
>> >>
>> >> root@ceph1:/root/cluster# rados bench -p coldstorage  300 seq
>> >> Total time run:        133.563980
>> >> Total reads made:     6041
>> >> Read size:            4194304
>> >> Bandwidth (MB/sec):    180.917
>> >>
>> >> Average Latency:       0.353559
>> >> Max latency:           1.83356
>> >> Min latency:           0.027878
>> >>
>> >> after configure cache-tier:
>> >> root@ubuntu:~/benchmarkcollect/Monitor# ceph osd tier add
>> coldstorage
>> >> hotstorage pool 'hotstorage' is now (or already was) a tier of
>> >> 'coldstorage'
>> >>
>> >> root@ubuntu:~/benchmarkcollect/Monitor# ceph osd tier cache-mode
>> >> hotstorage writeback set cache-mode for pool 'hotstorage' to
>> >> writeback
>> >>
>> >> root@ubuntu:~/benchmarkcollect/Monitor# ceph osd tier set-overlay
>> >> coldstorage hotstorage overlay for 'coldstorage' is now (or already
>> >> was) 'hotstorage'
>> >>
>> >> oot@ubuntu:~# ceph osd dump|grep storage pool 6 'coldstorage'
>> >> replicated size 3 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 0 object_hash rjenkins
>> >> pg_num 512 pgp_num 512 last_change 216 lfor 216 flags hashpspool
>> >> tiers 7 read_tier 7 write_tier 7 stripe_width 0 pool 7 'hotstorage'
>> >> replicated size 3 min_size 1 crush_ruleset 1 object_hash rjenkins
>> >> pg_num 128 pgp_num 128 last_change 228 flags
>> >> hashpspool,incomplete_clones tier_of 6 cache_mode writeback
>> >> target_bytes
>> >> 100000000000 hit_set bloom{false_positive_probability: 0.05, target_size:
>> >> 0, seed: 0} 3600s x6 stripe_width 0
>> >> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> rados bench -p coldstorage 300 write --no-cleanup Total time run:
>> >> 302.207573 Total writes made: 4315 Write size: 4194304 Bandwidth
>> >> (MB/sec): 57.113
>> >>
>> >> Stddev Bandwidth: 23.9375
>> >> Max bandwidth (MB/sec): 104
>> >> Min bandwidth (MB/sec): 0
>> >> Average Latency: 1.1204
>> >> Stddev Latency: 0.717092
>> >> Max latency: 6.97288
>> >> Min latency: 0.158371
>> >>
>> >> root@ubuntu:/# rados bench -p coldstorage 300 seq Total time run:
>> >> 153.869741 Total reads made: 4315 Read size: 4194304 Bandwidth
>> >> (MB/sec): 112.173
>> >>
>> >> Average Latency: 0.570487
>> >> Max latency: 1.75137
>> >> Min latency: 0.039635
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ceph.conf:
>> >> --------------------------------------------
>> >> [global]
>> >> fsid = 4ec1eb64-226c-4d90-8c5c-b6b6644be831
>> >> mon_initial_members = ceph2, ceph3, ceph4 mon_host =
>> >> 10.**.**.241,10.**.**.242,10.**.**.243
>> >> auth_cluster_required = cephx
>> >> auth_service_required = cephx
>> >> auth_client_required = cephx
>> >> filestore_xattr_use_omap = true
>> >> osd_pool_default_size = 3
>> >> osd_pool_default_min_size = 1
>> >> auth_supported = cephx
>> >> osd_journal_size = 10240
>> >> osd_mkfs_type = xfs
>> >> osd crush update on start = false
>> >>
>> >> [client]
>> >> rbd_cache = true
>> >> rbd_cache_writethrough_until_flush = false rbd_cache_size = 33554432
>> >> rbd_cache_max_dirty = 25165824 rbd_cache_target_dirty = 16777216
>> >> rbd_cache_max_dirty_age = 1 rbd_cache_block_writes_upfront = false
>> >> [osd] filestore_omap_header_cache_size = 40000
>> >> filestore_fd_cache_size = 40000 filestore_fiemap = true
>> >> client_readahead_min = 2097152 client_readahead_max_bytes = 0
>> >> client_readahead_max_periods = 4 filestore_journal_writeahead = false
>> >> filestore_max_sync_interval = 10 filestore_queue_max_ops = 500
>> >> filestore_queue_max_bytes = 1048576000
>> >> filestore_queue_committing_max_ops = 5000
>> >> filestore_queue_committing_max_bytes = 1048576000
>> >> keyvaluestore_queue_max_ops = 500 keyvaluestore_queue_max_bytes
>> =
>> >> 1048576000 journal_queue_max_ops = 30000 journal_queue_max_bytes
>> =
>> >> 3355443200 osd_op_threads = 20 osd_disk_threads = 8
>> >> filestore_op_threads = 4 osd_mount_options_xfs =
>> >> rw,noatime,nobarrier,inode64,logbsize=256k,delaylog
>> >>
>> >> [mon]
>> >> mon_osd_allow_primary_affinity=true
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> 使用Opera的电子邮件客户端:http://www.opera.com/mail/
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> ceph-users mailing list
>> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ceph-users mailing list
>> > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: Mailvelope v1.3.3
>> Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
>>
>> wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJWj/52CRDmVDuy+mK58QAAI1UP/jDBE95QirkgybKwOS5
>> V
>> fpCn+9tAk3psAkVEg3f9XdXtr2et0XSRiZ2Nce20Dj8OFsLcvNLuDXNEzwVH
>> DLJTmQIvxyEFliXZyW+Tp1aumQylhlWMT/4zgc8H1YUxo0EBaYG8xXsItTBx
>> DRHykhYPokn0lJxYBpqM6YyiTvAh1OsPL8fwDZaSan5uIaPD7VnbXmoYdkI3
>> jJ2TosK7qANlHCeDu2u4Ppc3Re3cA0+cCcf15vGabNe3yGbA+k1GvKLFgLLV
>> zuveqUdxfkDQuTRoepZo44nLVkTnsbQrrTyR2cYJxEI+p2UHh6gO0gzK4VOC
>> nR6/rhnw6ZEXOlVR4pU1Gc854D+yZx1u+VLDEO1Z8FBquRtfiReOj9qvnarM
>> PwuVSstLmL5Z9hOJ3+fL1ZGvBn+W8lO7SUurdi4IKGkuRygX7OrCvGkOVuzq
>> SxHce5u79GIRyIHT7SIeX2gLMTu1ox+ThM9S9iyAtUzVxHMA6qcOe1KzS0dR
>> hnG5K68bE3i7ynwYa6U5MGTTxZKX6oQn6FZ58jBZeAejacPVRT954YdbKMEJ
>> bN1qCuCrSTa8sufGNltb64y+crYBUQlGjvU78I0PcjfVIYH5irxc6qVGdzB1
>> eUqsz8tWaQPDCYAsG661YmSHf1fghNs8BpDST0u5uItvcIQ8BMeqwWeA+eED
>> Cpzq
>> =4mWK
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Mailvelope v1.3.3
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
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=EvoI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux