I believe so. I'm using ceph-9.2.0.
On Jan 2, 2016 9:53 AM, "Dan Nica" <dan.nica@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Are you using latest ceph-deploy ?
-----Original Message-----
From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adam
Sent: Saturday, January 2, 2016 4:22 AM
To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: systemd support?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
I'm running into the same install problem described here:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg23533.html
I tried compiling from source (ceph-9.2.0) to see if it had been fixed in the latest code, but I got the same error as with the pre-compiled binaries. Is there any solution or workaround to this?
If not, could someone point me to the code which is responsible and I'll see if I can fix it up and submit a patch?
Thanks,
Adam
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=HqHA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
