Re: =?gb18030?q?ceph_journal_failed=A3=BF?=

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



ok, You give me the answer, thanks a lot.

But, I don't know the answer to your questions.

Maybe someone else can answer.

------------------ Original ------------------
From: &nbsp;"Loris Cuoghi";<lc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Date: &nbsp;Tue, Dec 22, 2015 07:31 PM
To: &nbsp;"ceph-users"<ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Subject: &nbsp;Re:  ceph journal failed£¿

Le 22/12/2015 09:42, yuyang a ¨¦crit :
&gt; Hello, everyone,
[snip snap]

Hi

&gt; If the SSD failed or down, can the OSD work?
&gt; Is the osd down or only can be read?

If you don't have a journal anymore, the OSD has already quit, as it 
can't continue writing, nor it can assure data consistency, since writes 
have probably been interrupted.

The Ceph's community general assumption for a dead journal, is a dead OSD.

But.

http://www.sebastien-han.fr/blog/2014/11/27/ceph-recover-osds-after-ssd-journal-failure/

How does this apply in reality?
Is the solution that S¨¦bastien is proposing viable?
In most/all cases?
Will the OSD continue chugging along after this kind of surgery?
Is it necessary/suggested to deep scrub ASAP the OSD's placement groups?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
<br></ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx></lc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux