On Monday, December 7, 2015, Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is there anything we have to do?
or that upgrade path is not doable...
Shinobu
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gregory Farnum" <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Shinobu Kinjo" <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, December 8, 2015 10:36:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Ceph-Users] Upgrade Path to Hammer
As that ticket indicates, older versions of the code didn't create the
backtraces, so obviously they aren't present. That certainly includes
Dumpling!
-Greg
On Monday, December 7, 2015, Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Have any of you tried to upgrade the Ceph cluster through the following
> upgrade path.
>
> Dumpling -> Firefly -> Hammer
> * Each version is newest.
>
> After upgrading from Dumpling, Firefly to Hammer following this:
>
> http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/install/upgrading-ceph/
>
> I ended up with hitting ""warnings"" reported on:
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12715
>
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 600
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 601
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 602
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 603
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 604
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 605
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 606
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 607
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 608
> mds.0 [ERR] bad backtrace on dir ino 609
>
> If I've missed anything, point it out to me.
>
> Shinobu
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <_javascript_:;>
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
