hi Jan:
got it.
thanks for the reply.
At 2015-11-19 17:14:19, "Jan Schermer" <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >There's no added benefit - it just adds resiliency. >On the other hand - more monitors means more likelihood that one of them will break, when that happens there will be a brief interruption to some (not only management) operations. >If you decide to reduce the number of MONs then that is a PITA as it means recreating for example libvirt domains (mon addresses are pretty much hardcoded in there). >Just keep at at 3 unless you have more than 3 datacenters. > >Jan > >> On 19 Nov 2015, at 09:35, <xizhiyong18@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> hi all: >> >> As the title, if I deploy more than three ceph-mon node, I can tolerate more monitor node failture, what I wana know is, is there any other benefit， for example, better for IOPS or latency? On the other hand, what the disadvantage if it has？ >> >> best regards~ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
