I’m working with some teams who would like to not only create ACLs within RADOSGW to a tenant level, they would like to tailor ACLs to users within that tenant. After trial and error, I can only seem to get ACLs to stick at a tenant level using the keystone
tenant ID uuid.
Is this expected behavior for RadosGW ? Can you only assign bucket ACLs on a tenant level with Keystone auth? There doesn’t seem to be a lot of doco out there around RadosGW with Keystone auth and its implications.
|
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com