Just to be clear, there's no longer going to be a generic http://downloads.ceph.com/debian (sans -{ceph-release-name}) path? In other words, we'll have to monitor something else to determine what's considered stable for our {distro-release} and then update the sources to point at a new debian-{ceph-release-name} ourselves, correct?
Thanks,
Brian
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015, 09:45 Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The new locations are in:
http://packages.ceph.com/
For debian this would be:
http://packages.ceph.com/debian-{release}
Note that ceph-extras is no longer available: the current repos should
provide everything/anything that is needed to properly install
ceph. Otherwise, please let us know .
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 10:35 AM, Brian Kroth <bpkroth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hmm, apparently I haven't gotten that far in my email backlog yet. That's
> good to know too.
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>
> Olivier Bonvalet <ceph.list@xxxxxxxxx> 2015-09-18 16:02:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> not sure if it's related, but there is recent changes because of a
>> security issue :
>>
>>
>> http://ceph.com/releases/important-security-notice-regarding-signing-key-and-binary-downloads-of-ceph/
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Le vendredi 18 septembre 2015 à 08:45 -0500, Brian Kroth a écrit :
>>>
>>> Hi all, we've had the following in our
>>> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ceph.list
>>> for a while based on some previous docs,
>>>
>>> # ceph upstream stable (currently giant) release packages for wheezy:
>>> deb http://ceph.com/debian/ wheezy main
>>>
>>> # ceph extras:
>>> deb http://ceph.com/packages/ceph-extras/debian wheezy main
>>>
>>> but it seems like the straight "debian/" portion of that path has
>>> gone
>>> missing recently, and now there's only debian-firefly/, debian
>>> -giant/,
>>> debian-hammer/, etc.
>>>
>>> Is that just an oversight, or should we be switching our sources to
>>> one
>>> of the named releases? I figured that the unnamed one would
>>> automatically track what ceph currently considered "stable" for the
>>> target distro release for me, but maybe that's not the case.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brian
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
