Re: Cephfs total throughput

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FWIW I wouldn't totally trust these numbers. At one point a while back I had ceph reporting 226GB/s for several seconds sustained. While that would have been really fantastic, I suspect it probably wasn't the case. ;)

Mark

On 09/15/2015 11:25 AM, Barclay Jameson wrote:
Unfortunately, it's not longer idle as my CephFS cluster is now in production :)

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Barclay Jameson
<almightybeeij@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, I asked this on the irc as well but I will ask it here as well.

When one does 'ceph -s' it shows client IO.

The question is simple.

Is this total throughput or what the clients would see?

Since it's replication factor of 3 that means for every write 3 are
actually written.

First lets assume I have only one cephfs client writing data.

If this is total throughput then to get the maximum throughput for
what a client would see do I need to divide it by 3?

Else, if this is what my client sees then do I need to multiply this
by 3 to see what my maximum cluster throughput would be?

I believe this is client-facing IO. It's pretty simple to check if
you've got an idle cluster; run rados bench and see if they're about
the same or about three times as large. ;)
-Greg
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux