Re: Question on cephfs recovery tools

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Goncalo,

>>     a./ Under a situation as the one describe above, how can we safely
>>     terminate cephfs in the clients? I have had situations where
>>     umount simply hangs and there is no real way to unblock the
>>     situation unless I reboot the client. If we have hundreds of
>>     clients, I would like to avoid that.

Use "lsof" to find process accessing filesystem. I would see process id.
And then kill that process using:

 kill -9 <pid>

But you **must** make sure if it's ok or not to kill that process.
You have to be careful no matter when you kill any process.

>>     b./ I was expecting to have lost metadata information since I've
>>     clean OSDs where metadata information was stored for the
>>     /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt file. I was a bit surprised that
>>     the /'cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt' was still properly
>>     referenced, without me having to run any recover tool. What am I
>>     missing?
>>
>>     c./ After recovering the cluster, I though I was in a cephfs
>>     situation where I had
>>         c.1 files with holes (because of lost PGs and objects in the
>>     data pool)
>>         c.2 files without metadata (because of lost PGs and objects in
>>     the metadata pool)
>>         c.3 metadata without associated files (because of lost PGs and
>>     objects in the data pool)
>>     I've tried to run the recovery tools, but I have several doubts
>>     which I did not found described in the documentation
>>         - Is there a specific order / a way to run the tools for the
>>     c.1, c.2 and c.3 cases I mentioned?

What is the recovery tools?
How did you do with that tool?
I'm just assuming d) -;

Am I right?

If so, why did you use that tool?

>>     d./ Since I was testing, I simply ran the following sequence but I
>>     am not sure of what the command are doing, nor if the sequence is
>>     correct. I think an example use case should be documented.
>>     Specially the cephfs-data-scan did not returned any output, or
>>     information. So, I am not sure if anything happened at all.
>>
>>         # cephfs-table-tool 0 reset session
>>         {
>>             "0": {
>>                 "data": {},
>>                 "result": 0
>>             }
>>         }
>>
>>         # cephfs-table-tool 0 reset snap
>>         {
>>             "result": 0
>>         }
>>
>>         # cephfs-table-tool 0 reset inode
>>         {
>>             "0": {
>>                 "data": {},
>>                 "result": 0
>>             }
>>         }
>>
>>         # cephfs-journal-tool --rank=0 journal reset
>>         old journal was 4194304~22381701
>>         new journal start will be 29360128 (2784123 bytes past old end)
>>         writing journal head
>>         writing EResetJournal entry
>>         done
>>
>>         # cephfs-data-scan init
>>
>>         # cephfs-data-scan scan_extents cephfs_dt
>>         # cephfs-data-scan scan_inodes cephfs_dt
>>
>>         # cephfs-data-scan scan_extents --force-pool cephfs_mt
>>         (doesn't seem to work)
>>
>>     e./ After running the cephfs tools, everything seemed exactly in
>>     the same status. No visible changes or errors at the filesystem
>>     level. So, at this point not sure what to conclude...

Anyway just let me know if your ceph cluster is production or not.
I do hope, not -;

Shinobu

----- Original Message -----
From: goncalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: "Shinobu Kinjo" <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 9:50:30 PM
Subject: Re:  Question on cephfs recovery tools


Hi Shinobu

I did check that page but I do not think that in its current state it  
helps much.

If you look to my email, I did try the operations documented there but  
nothing substantial really happened. The tools do not produce any  
output so I am not sure what they did, if they did something at all.  
 From the documentation it is also not obvious in which situations we  
should use the tools, and if there is a particular order to run them.

The reason for my email is to get some clarification on that.

Cheers

Quoting Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>:

> Anyhow this page would help you:
>
>     http://ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/disaster-recovery/
>
> Shinobu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Shinobu Kinjo" <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Goncalo Borges" <goncalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 5:28:38 PM
> Subject: Re:  Question on cephfs recovery tools
>
> Did you try to identify what kind of processes were accessing  
> filesystem using fuser or lsof and then kill them?
> If not, you had to do that first.
>
> Shinobu
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Goncalo Borges" <goncalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2015 5:04:23 PM
> Subject: Re:  Question on cephfs recovery tools
>
> Hi Shinobu
>
>> Did you unmount filesystem using?
>>
>>   umount -l
>
> Yes!
> Goncalo
>
>>
>> Shinobu
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Goncalo Borges
>> <goncalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:goncalo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     Dear Ceph / CephFS gurus...
>>
>>     Bare a bit with me while I give you a bit of context. Questions
>>     will appear at the end.
>>
>>     1) I am currently running ceph 9.0.3 and I have install it  to
>>     test the cephfs recovery tools.
>>
>>     2) I've created a situation where I've deliberately (on purpose)
>>     lost some data and metadata (check annex 1 after the main email).
>>
>>     3) I've stopped the mds, and waited to check how the cluster
>>     reacts. After some time, as expected, the cluster reports a ERROR
>>     state, with a lot of PGs degraded and stuck
>>
>>         # ceph -s
>>             cluster 8465c6a6-5eb4-4cdf-8845-0de552d0a738
>>              health HEALTH_ERR
>>                     174 pgs degraded
>>                     48 pgs stale
>>                     174 pgs stuck degraded
>>                     41 pgs stuck inactive
>>                     48 pgs stuck stale
>>                     238 pgs stuck unclean
>>                     174 pgs stuck undersized
>>                     174 pgs undersized
>>                     recovery 22366/463263 objects degraded (4.828%)
>>                     recovery 8190/463263 objects misplaced (1.768%)
>>                     too many PGs per OSD (388 > max 300)
>>                     mds rank 0 has failed
>>                     mds cluster is degraded
>>              monmap e1: 3 mons at
>>         {mon1=X.X.X.X:6789/0,mon2=Y.Y.Y.Y:6789/0,mon3=Z.Z.Z.Z:6789/0}
>>                     election epoch 10, quorum 0,1,2 mon1,mon3,mon2
>>              mdsmap e24: 0/1/1 up, 1 failed
>>              osdmap e544: 21 osds: 15 up, 15 in; 87 remapped pgs
>>               pgmap v25699: 2048 pgs, 2 pools, 602 GB data, 150 kobjects
>>                     1715 GB used, 40027 GB / 41743 GB avail
>>                     22366/463263 objects degraded (4.828%)
>>                     8190/463263 objects misplaced (1.768%)
>>                         1799 active+clean
>>                          110 active+undersized+degraded
>>                           60 active+remapped
>>                           37 stale+undersized+degraded+peered
>>                           23 active+undersized+degraded+remapped
>>                           11 stale+active+clean
>>                            4 undersized+degraded+peered
>>                            4 active
>>
>>     4) I've umounted the cephfs clients ('umount -l' worked for me
>>     this time but I already had situations where 'umount' would simply
>>     hang, and the only viable solutions would be to reboot the client).
>>
>>     5) I've recovered the ceph cluster by (details on the recover
>>     operations are in annex 2 after the main email.)
>>     - declaring the osds lost
>>     - removing the osds from the crush map
>>     - letting the cluster stabilize and letting all the recover I/O finish
>>     - identifying stuck PGs
>>     - checking if they existed, and if not recreate them.
>>
>>
>>     6) I've restarted the MDS. Initially, the mds cluster was
>>     considered degraded but after some small amount of time, that
>>     message disappeared. The WARNING status was just because of "too
>>     many PGs per OSD (409 > max 300)"
>>
>>         # ceph -s
>>             cluster 8465c6a6-5eb4-4cdf-8845-0de552d0a738
>>              health HEALTH_WARN
>>                     too many PGs per OSD (409 > max 300)
>>                     mds cluster is degraded
>>              monmap e1: 3 mons at
>>         {mon1=X.X.X.X:6789/0,mon2=Y.Y.Y.Y:6789/0,mon3=Z.Z.Z.Z:6789/0}
>>                     election epoch 10, quorum 0,1,2 mon1,mon3,mon2
>>              mdsmap e27: 1/1/1 up {0=rccephmds=up:reconnect}
>>              osdmap e614: 15 osds: 15 up, 15 in
>>               pgmap v27304: 2048 pgs, 2 pools, 586 GB data, 146 kobjects
>>                     1761 GB used, 39981 GB / 41743 GB avail
>>                         2048 active+clean
>>           client io 4151 kB/s rd, 1 op/s
>>
>>         (wait some time)
>>
>>         # ceph -s
>>             cluster 8465c6a6-5eb4-4cdf-8845-0de552d0a738
>>              health HEALTH_WARN
>>                     too many PGs per OSD (409 > max 300)
>>              monmap e1: 3 mons at
>>         {mon1=X.X.X.X:6789/0,mon2=Y.Y.Y.Y:6789/0,mon3=Z.Z.Z.Z:6789/0}
>>                     election epoch 10, quorum 0,1,2 mon1,mon3,mon2
>>              mdsmap e29: 1/1/1 up {0=rccephmds=up:active}
>>              osdmap e614: 15 osds: 15 up, 15 in
>>               pgmap v30442: 2048 pgs, 2 pools, 586 GB data, 146 kobjects
>>                     1761 GB used, 39981 GB / 41743 GB avail
>>                         2048 active+clean
>>
>>     7) I was able to mount the cephfs filesystem in a client. When I
>>     tried to read a file made of some lost objects, I got holes in
>>     part of the file (compare with the same operation on annex 1)
>>
>>         # od /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt | head
>>         0000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000 000000
>>         *
>>         2000000 176665 053717 015710 124465 047254 102011 065275 123534
>>         2000020 015727 131070 075673 176566 047511 154343 146334 006111
>>         2000040 050506 102172 172362 121464 003532 005427 137554 137111
>>         2000060 071444 052477 123364 127652 043562 144163 170405 026422
>>         2000100 050316 117337 042573 171037 150704 071144 066344 116653
>>         2000120 076041 041546 030235 055204 016253 136063 046012 066200
>>         2000140 171626 123573 065351 032357 171326 132673 012213 016046
>>         2000160 022034 160053 156107 141471 162551 124615 102247 125502
>>
>>
>>     Finally the questions:
>>
>>     a./ Under a situation as the one describe above, how can we safely
>>     terminate cephfs in the clients? I have had situations where
>>     umount simply hangs and there is no real way to unblock the
>>     situation unless I reboot the client. If we have hundreds of
>>     clients, I would like to avoid that.
>>
>>     b./ I was expecting to have lost metadata information since I've
>>     clean OSDs where metadata information was stored for the
>>     /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt file. I was a bit surprised that
>>     the /'cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt' was still properly
>>     referenced, without me having to run any recover tool. What am I
>>     missing?
>>
>>     c./ After recovering the cluster, I though I was in a cephfs
>>     situation where I had
>>         c.1 files with holes (because of lost PGs and objects in the
>>     data pool)
>>         c.2 files without metadata (because of lost PGs and objects in
>>     the metadata pool)
>>         c.3 metadata without associated files (because of lost PGs and
>>     objects in the data pool)
>>     I've tried to run the recovery tools, but I have several doubts
>>     which I did not found described in the documentation
>>         - Is there a specific order / a way to run the tools for the
>>     c.1, c.2 and c.3 cases I mentioned?
>>
>>     d./ Since I was testing, I simply ran the following sequence but I
>>     am not sure of what the command are doing, nor if the sequence is
>>     correct. I think an example use case should be documented.
>>     Specially the cephfs-data-scan did not returned any output, or
>>     information. So, I am not sure if anything happened at all.
>>
>>         # cephfs-table-tool 0 reset session
>>         {
>>             "0": {
>>                 "data": {},
>>                 "result": 0
>>             }
>>         }
>>
>>         # cephfs-table-tool 0 reset snap
>>         {
>>             "result": 0
>>         }
>>
>>         # cephfs-table-tool 0 reset inode
>>         {
>>             "0": {
>>                 "data": {},
>>                 "result": 0
>>             }
>>         }
>>
>>         # cephfs-journal-tool --rank=0 journal reset
>>         old journal was 4194304~22381701
>>         new journal start will be 29360128 (2784123 bytes past old end)
>>         writing journal head
>>         writing EResetJournal entry
>>         done
>>
>>         # cephfs-data-scan init
>>
>>         # cephfs-data-scan scan_extents cephfs_dt
>>         # cephfs-data-scan scan_inodes cephfs_dt
>>
>>         # cephfs-data-scan scan_extents --force-pool cephfs_mt
>>         (doesn't seem to work)
>>
>>     e./ After running the cephfs tools, everything seemed exactly in
>>     the same status. No visible changes or errors at the filesystem
>>     level. So, at this point not sure what to conclude...
>>
>>
>>     Thank you in Advance for your responses
>>     Cheers
>>     Goncalo
>>
>>
>>     # #####################
>>     # ANNEX 1: GENERATE DATA LOSS #
>>     # #####################
>>
>>     1) Check a file
>>     # ls -l /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt
>>     -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5368709120 Sep  8 03:55
>>     /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     2) See its contents
>>     # od /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt |  head
>>     0000000 150343 117016 156040 100553 154377 174521 137643 047440
>>     0000020 006310 013157 064422 136662 145623 116101 137007 031237
>>     0000040 111570 010104 103540 126335 014632 053445 006114 047003
>>     0000060 123201 170045 042771 036561 152363 017716 000405 053556
>>     0000100 102524 106517 066114 071112 144366 011405 074170 032621
>>     0000120 047761 177217 103414 000774 174320 122332 110323 065706
>>     0000140 042467 035356 132363 067446 145351 155277 177533 062050
>>     0000160 016303 030741 066567 043517 172655 176016 017304 033342
>>     0000200 177440 130510 163707 060513 055027 107702 023012 130435
>>     0000220 022342 011762 035372 044033 152230 043424 004062 177461
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     3) Get its inode, and convert it to HEX
>>     # ls -li /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt
>>     1099511627812 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5368709120 Sep  8 03:55
>>     /cephfs/goncalo/5Gbytes_029.txt
>>
>>     (1099511627812)_base = (10000000024)_base16
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     4) Get the osd pool details
>>     # ceph osd pool ls detail
>>     pool 1 'cephfs_dt' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_ruleset 0
>>     object_hash rjenkins pg_num 1024 pgp_num 1024 last_change 196
>>     flags hashpspool crash_replay_interval 45 stripe_width 0
>>     pool 2 'cephfs_mt' replicated size 3 min_size 2 crush_ruleset 0
>>     object_hash rjenkins pg_num 1024 pgp_num 1024 last_change 182
>>     flags hashpspool stripe_width 0
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     5) Get the file / PG / OSD mapping
>>
>>     # ceph osd map cephfs_dt 10000000024.00000000
>>     osdmap e479 pool 'cephfs_dt' (1) object '10000000024.00000000' ->
>>     pg 1.c18fbb6f (1.36f) -> up ([19,15,6], p19) acting ([19,15,6], p19)
>>     # ceph osd map cephfs_mt 10000000024.00000000
>>     osdmap e479 pool 'cephfs_mt' (2) object '10000000024.00000000' ->
>>     pg 2.c18fbb6f (2.36f) -> up ([27,23,13], p27) acting ([27,23,13], p27)
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     6) Kill the relevant osd daemons, umount the osd partition and
>>     delete the partitions
>>
>>     [root@server1 ~]# for o in 6; do dev=`df /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o
>>     | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $1}'`; /etc/init.d/ceph stop osd.$o;
>>     umount /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o; parted -s ${dev::8} rm 1; parted
>>     -s  ${dev::8} rm 2; partprobe; done
>>     [root@server2 ~]# for o in 13 15; do dev=`df
>>     /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $1}'`;
>>     /etc/init.d/ceph stop osd.$o; umount /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o;
>>     parted -s ${dev::8} rm 1; parted -s  ${dev::8} rm 2; partprobe; done
>>     [root@server3 ~]# for o in 19 23; do dev=`df
>>     /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $1}'`;
>>     /etc/init.d/ceph stop osd.$o; umount /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o;
>>     parted -s ${dev::8} rm 1; parted -s  ${dev::8} rm 2; partprobe; done
>>     [root@server4 ~]# for o in 27; do dev=`df
>>     /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o | tail -n 1 | awk '{print $1}'`;
>>     /etc/init.d/ceph stop osd.$o; umount /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-$o;
>>     parted -s ${dev::8} rm 1; parted -s  ${dev::8} rm 2; partprobe; done
>>
>>
>>     # #######################
>>     # ANNEX 2: RECOVER CEPH CLUSTER #
>>     # #######################
>>
>>     1) Declare OSDS losts
>>
>>     # for o in 6 13 15 19 23 27;do ceph osd lost $o
>>     --yes-i-really-mean-it; done
>>     marked osd lost in epoch 480
>>     marked osd lost in epoch 482
>>     marked osd lost in epoch 487
>>     marked osd lost in epoch 483
>>     marked osd lost in epoch 489
>>     marked osd lost in epoch 485
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     2) Remove OSDs from CRUSH map
>>
>>     # for o in 6 13 15 19 23 27;do ceph osd crush remove osd.$o; ceph
>>     osd down $o; ceph osd rm $o; ceph auth del osd.$o; done
>>     removed item id 6 name 'osd.6' from crush map
>>     osd.6 is already down.
>>     removed osd.6
>>     updated
>>     removed item id 13 name 'osd.13' from crush map
>>     osd.13 is already down.
>>     removed osd.13
>>     updated
>>     removed item id 15 name 'osd.15' from crush map
>>     osd.15 is already down.
>>     removed osd.15
>>     updated
>>     removed item id 19 name 'osd.19' from crush map
>>     osd.19 is already down.
>>     removed osd.19
>>     updated
>>     removed item id 23 name 'osd.23' from crush map
>>     osd.23 is already down.
>>     removed osd.23
>>     updated
>>     removed item id 27 name 'osd.27' from crush map
>>     osd.27 is already down.
>>     removed osd.27
>>     updated
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     3) Give time to the cluster react, and to the recover I/O to finish.
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     4) Check which PGS are still stale
>>
>>     # ceph pg dump_stuck stale
>>     ok
>>     pg_stat    state    up    up_primary    acting acting_primary
>>     1.23    stale+undersized+degraded+peered    [23]    23 [23]    23
>>     2.38b    stale+undersized+degraded+peered    [23]    23 [23]    23
>>     (...)
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     5) Try to query those stale PGs
>>
>>     # for pg in `ceph pg dump_stuck stale | grep ^[12]  | awk '{print
>>     $1}'`; do ceph pg $pg query; done
>>     ok
>>     Error ENOENT: i don't have pgid 1.23
>>     Error ENOENT: i don't have pgid 2.38b
>>     (...)
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     6) Create the non existing PGs
>>
>>     # for pg in `ceph pg dump_stuck stale | grep ^[12]  | awk '{print
>>     $1}'`; do ceph pg force_create_pg $pg; done
>>     ok
>>     pg 1.23 now creating, ok
>>     pg 2.38b now creating, ok
>>     (...)
>>
>>     --- * ---
>>
>>     7) At this point, for the PGs to leave the 'creating' status, I
>>     had to restart all remaining OSDs. Otherwise those PGs were in the
>>     creating state forever.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     --
>>     Goncalo Borges
>>     Research Computing
>>     ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
>>     School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW  2006
>>     T:+61 2 93511937 <tel:%2B61%202%2093511937>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     ceph-users mailing list
>>     ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>     http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Email:
>> - shinobu@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:shinobu@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Blog:
>>  - Life with Distributed Computational System based on OpenSource
>> <http://i-shinobu.hatenablog.com/>
>
> --
> Goncalo Borges
> Research Computing
> ARC Centre of Excellence for Particle Physics at the Terascale
> School of Physics A28 | University of Sydney, NSW  2006
> T: +61 2 93511937
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux