Re: btrfs ready for production?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



btrfs has been discussed at length here. Search the archives if you want more detail, but my take on it is that you probably shouldn't use it production right now. Also from http://ceph.com/docs/master/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations/

"We currently recommend XFS for production deployments. We recommend btrfs for testing, development, and any non-critical deployments. We believe that btrfs has the correct feature set and roadmap to serve Ceph in the long-term, but XFS and ext4 provide the necessary stability for today’s deployments. btrfs development is proceeding rapidly: users should be comfortable installing the latest released upstream kernels and be able to track development activity for critical bug fixes."

QH

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 1:53 AM, Alan Zhang <alan.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi everyone:

as ceph doc currently recommend:

If you use the btrfs file system with Ceph, we recommend using a recent Linux kernel (v3.14 or later).

so, I want to know:
1. if we use btrfs base on linux kernel 3.14 or later, it is ready for production?
2. Any one have use btrfs on production env?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux