Are you using lacp in 10g interfaces? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mariusz Gronczewski" <mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> To: "Shinobu Kinjo" <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Jan Schermer" <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 9:58:33 PM Subject: Re: Huge memory usage spike in OSD on hammer/giant that was on 10Gbit interface between OSDs, not from outside, traffic from outside was rather low (eth0/1 public - 2/3 cluster) On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 08:42:09 -0400 (EDT), Shinobu Kinjo <skinjo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > How heavy network traffic was? > > Have you tried to capture that traffic between cluster and public network > to see where such a bunch of traffic came from? > > Shinobu > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jan Schermer" <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Mariusz Gronczewski" <mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, September 7, 2015 9:17:04 PM > Subject: Re: Huge memory usage spike in OSD on hammer/giant > > Hmm, even network traffic went up. > Nothing in logs on the mons which started 9/4 ~6 AM? > > Jan > > > On 07 Sep 2015, at 14:11, Mariusz Gronczewski <mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:44:55 +0200, Jan Schermer <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> Maybe some configuration change occured that now takes effect when you start the OSD? > >> Not sure what could affect memory usage though - some ulimit values maybe (stack size), number of OSD threads (compare the number from this OSD to the rest of OSDs), fd cache size. Look in /proc and compare everything. > >> Also look in "ceph osd tree" - didn't someone touch it while you were gone? > >> > >> Jan > >> > > > >> number of OSD threads (compare the number from this OSD to the rest of > > OSDs), > > > > it occured on all OSDs, and it looked like that > > http://imgur.com/IIMIyRG > > > > sadly I was on vacation so I didnt manage to catch it before ;/ but I'm > > sure there was no config change > > > > > >>> On 07 Sep 2015, at 13:40, Mariusz Gronczewski <mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015 13:02:38 +0200, Jan Schermer <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Apart from bug causing this, this could be caused by failure of other OSDs (even temporary) that starts backfills. > >>>> > >>>> 1) something fails > >>>> 2) some PGs move to this OSD > >>>> 3) this OSD has to allocate memory for all the PGs > >>>> 4) whatever fails gets back up > >>>> 5) the memory is never released. > >>>> > >>>> A similiar scenario is possible if for example someone confuses "ceph osd crush reweight" with "ceph osd reweight" (yes, this happened to me :-)). > >>>> > >>>> Did you try just restarting the OSD before you upgraded it? > >>> > >>> stopped, upgraded, started. it helped a bit ( <3GB per OSD) but beside > >>> that nothing changed. I've tried to wait till it stops eating CPU then > >>> restart it but it still eats >2GB of memory which means I can't start > >>> all 4 OSDs at same time ;/ > >>> > >>> I've also added noin,nobackfill,norecover flags but that didnt help > >>> > >>> it is suprising for me because before all 4 OSDs total ate less than > >>> 2GBs of memory so I though I have enough headroom, and we did restart > >>> machines and removed/added os to test if recovery/rebalance goes fine > >>> > >>> it also does not have any external traffic at the moment > >>> > >>> > >>>>> On 07 Sep 2015, at 12:58, Mariusz Gronczewski <mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> over a weekend (was on vacation so I didnt get exactly what happened) > >>>>> our OSDs started eating in excess of 6GB of RAM (well RSS), which was a > >>>>> problem considering that we had only 8GB of ram for 4 OSDs (about 700 > >>>>> pgs per osd and about 70GB space used. So spam of coredumps and OOMs > >>>>> blocked the osds down to unusabiltity. > >>>>> > >>>>> I then upgraded one of OSDs to hammer which made it a bit better (~2GB > >>>>> per osd) but still much higher usage than before. > >>>>> > >>>>> any ideas what would be a reason for that ? logs are mostly full on > >>>>> OSDs trying to recover and timed out heartbeats > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator > >>>>> > >>>>> Efigence S. A. > >>>>> ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa > >>>>> T: [+48] 22 380 13 13 > >>>>> F: [+48] 22 380 13 14 > >>>>> E: mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> <mailto:mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> ceph-users mailing list > >>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator > >>> > >>> Efigence S. A. > >>> ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa > >>> T: [+48] 22 380 13 13 > >>> F: [+48] 22 380 13 14 > >>> E: mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> <mailto:mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator > > > > Efigence S. A. > > ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa > > T: [+48] 22 380 13 13 > > F: [+48] 22 380 13 14 > > E: mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > <mailto:mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com -- Mariusz Gronczewski, Administrator Efigence S. A. ul. Wołoska 9a, 02-583 Warszawa T: [+48] 22 380 13 13 F: [+48] 22 380 13 14 E: mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mariusz.gronczewski@xxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |