Re: ceph distributed osd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

You will be the one best equipped to answer the performance question. You will have to figure out what minimal performance your application will need. Then you have to match the disks to that (disk random IOPs * # disks) / replicas will get you in the ball park. If you are not using SSDs for journals, I'd half the number you get from the equation. You will have to determine if your max performance for each client will fit in a 1 Gb link.

There is not enough information for me to give you a good answer. My gut is that if you have 12 clients in a cluster, you are doing that for performance, in which case I would say it is not enough.

- ----------------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904  C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1

On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:19 AM, gjprabu  wrote:
Hi Robert,

        We are going to use ceph with ocfs2 in production. Here my doubt is rbd mounted in 12 clients using ocfs2 clustering and network for server & client will be 1 Gig. Is the throughput performance is ok for this setup? 

Regards
Prabu

- ---- On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 02:15:53 +0530 gjprabu  wrote ----

Hi Robert,

Thanks for your replay. We understand the senarios.


Regards
Prabu



- ---- On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 00:15:41 +0530 robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote ----

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

By default, all pools will use all OSDs. Each RBD, for instance, is
broken up into 4 MB objects and those objects are somewhat uniformly
distributed between the OSDs. When you add another OSD, the CRUSH map
is recalculated and the OSDs shuffle the objects to their new
locations somewhat uniformly distributing them across all available
OSDs.

I say uniformly distributed because it is based on the hashing
algorithm of the name and size is not taken into account. So you may
have more larger objects on some OSDs than others. The number of PGs
affect the ability to more uniformly distribute the data (more hash
buckets for data to land in).

You can create CRUSH rules that limit selection of OSDs to a subset
and then configure a pool to use those rules. This is a pretty
advanced configuration option.

I hope that helps with your question.
- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Mailvelope v1.0.0
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
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=a+24
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- ----------------
Robert LeBlanc
PGP Fingerprint 79A2 9CA4 6CC4 45DD A904 C70E E654 3BB2 FA62 B9F1


On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 8:26 AM, gjprabu  wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> What i mean , we have three OSD with Harddisk size each 1TB and two
> pool (poolA and poolB) with replica 2. Here writing behavior is the
> confusion for us. Our assumptions is below.
>
> PoolA -- may write with OSD1 and OSD2 (is this correct)
>
> PoolB -- may write with OSD3 and OSD1 (is this correct)
>
> suppose the hard disk size got full , then how many OSD's need to be added
> and How will be the writing behavior to new OSD's
>
> After added few osd's
>
> PoolA -- may write with OSD4 and OSD5 (is this correct)
> PoolB -- may write with OSD5 and OSD6 (is this correct)
>
>
> Regards
> Prabu
>
> ---- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 19:41:53 +0530 Luis Periquito 
> wrote ----
>
> I don't understand your question? You created a 1G RBD/disk and it's full.
> You are able to grow it though - but that's a Linux management issue, not
> ceph.
>
> As everything is thin-provisioned you can create a RBD with an arbitrary
> size - I've create one with 1PB when the cluster only had 600G/Raw
> available.
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:18 PM, gjprabu  wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Anybody can help on this issue.
>
> Regards
> Prabu
>
> ---- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:08:28 +0530 gjprabu  wrote
> ----
>
> Hi All,
>
> Also please find osd information.
>
> ceph osd dump | grep 'replicated size'
> pool 2 'repo' replicated size 2 min_size 2 crush_ruleset 0 object_hash
> rjenkins pg_num 126 pgp_num 126 last_change 21573 flags hashpspool
> stripe_width 0
>
> Regards
> Prabu
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Mon, 17 Aug 2015 11:58:55 +0530 gjprabu  wrote
> ----
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> We need to test three OSD and one image with replica 2(size 1GB). While
> testing data is not writing above 1GB. Is there any option to write on third
> OSD.
>
> ceph osd pool get repo pg_num
> pg_num: 126
>
> # rbd showmapped
> id pool image snap device
> 0 rbd integdownloads - /dev/rbd0 -- Already one
> 2 repo integrepotest - /dev/rbd2 -- newly created
>
>
> [root@hm2 repository]# df -Th
> Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda5 ext4 289G 18G 257G 7% /
> devtmpfs devtmpfs 252G 0 252G 0% /dev
> tmpfs tmpfs 252G 0 252G 0% /dev/shm
> tmpfs tmpfs 252G 538M 252G 1% /run
> tmpfs tmpfs 252G 0 252G 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
> /dev/sda2 ext4 488M 212M 241M 47% /boot
> /dev/sda4 ext4 1.9T 20G 1.8T 2% /var
> /dev/mapper/vg0-zoho ext4 8.6T 1.7T 6.5T 21% /zoho
> /dev/rbd0 ocfs2 977G 101G 877G 11% /zoho/build/downloads
> /dev/rbd2 ocfs2 1000M 1000M 0 100% /zoho/build/repository
>
> @:~$ scp -r sample.txt root@integ-hm2:/zoho/build/repository/
> root@integ-hm2's password:
> sample.txt
> 100% 1024MB 4.5MB/s 03:48
> scp: /zoho/build/repository//sample.txt: No space left on device
>
> Regards
> Prabu
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:42:11 +0530 gjprabu  wrote
> ----
>
>
>
> Dear Team,
>
> We are using two ceph OSD with replica 2 and it is working
> properly. Here my doubt is (Pool A -image size will be 10GB) and its
> replicated with two OSD, what will happen suppose if the size reached the
> limit, Is there any chance to make the data to continue writing in another
> two OSD's.
>
> Regards
> Prabu
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: Mailvelope v1.0.2
Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com
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=zcSY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux