> -----Original Message----- > From: ceph-devel-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ceph-devel- > owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Sage Weil > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2015 12:45 PM > To: ceph-announce@xxxxxxxx; ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ceph-users@xxxxxxxx; > ceph-maintainers@xxxxxxxx > Subject: v9.0.3 released > > This is the second to last batch of development work for the Infernalis > cycle. The most intrusive change is an internal (non user-visible) change to > the OSD's ObjectStore interface. Many fixes and improvements elsewhere > across RGW, RBD, and another big pile of CephFS scrub/repair improvements. > > > Getting Ceph > ------------ > > * Git at git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git > * Tarball at http://ceph.com/download/ceph-9.0.3.tar.gz > * For packages, see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/get-packages > * For ceph-deploy, see http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/install-ceph- > deploy > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in the > body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html I have built rpms from the tarball http://ceph.com/download/ceph-9.0.3.tar.bz2. Have done this for fedora 21 x86_64 and for aarch64. On both platforms when I run a single node "cluster" with a few osds and run rados bench read tests (either seq or rand) I get occasional reports like benchmark_data_myhost_20729_object73 is not correct! I never saw these with similar rpm builds on these platforms from 9.0.2 sources. Also, if I go to an x86-64 system running Ubuntu trusty for which I am able to install prebuilt binary packages via ceph-deploy install --dev v9.0.3 I do not see the errors there. Any suggestions welcome. -- Tom Deneau, AMD _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |