пятница, 21 августа 2015 г. пользователь Samuel Just написал:
And you adjusted the journals by removing the osd, recreating it with
a larger journal, and reinserting it?
-Sam
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
<igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Right ( but also was rebalancing cycle 2 day before pgs corrupted)
>
> 2015-08-21 2:23 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>
>> Specifically, the snap behavior (we already know that the pgs went
>> inconsistent while the pool was in writeback mode, right?).
>> -Sam
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Yeah, I'm trying to confirm that the issues did happen in writeback
>> > mode.
>> > -Sam
>> >
>> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
>> > <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> Right. But issues started...
>> >>
>> >> 2015-08-21 2:20 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>>
>> >>> But that was still in writeback mode, right?
>> >>> -Sam
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
>> >>> <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> > WE haven't set values for max_bytes / max_objects.. and all data
>> >>> > initially
>> >>> > writes only to cache layer and not flushed at all to cold layer.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Then we received notification from monitoring that we collect about
>> >>> > 750GB in
>> >>> > hot pool ) So i changed values for max_object_bytes to be 0,9 of
>> >>> > disk
>> >>> > size... And then evicting/flushing started...
>> >>> >
>> >>> > And issue with snapshots arrived
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2015-08-21 2:15 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Not sure what you mean by:
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> but it's stop to work in same moment, when cache layer fulfilled
>> >>> >> with
>> >>> >> data and evict/flush started...
>> >>> >> -Sam
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
>> >>> >> <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> > No, when we start draining cache - bad pgs was in place...
>> >>> >> > We have big rebalance (disk by disk - to change journal side on
>> >>> >> > both
>> >>> >> > hot/cold layers).. All was Ok, but after 2 days - arrived scrub
>> >>> >> > errors
>> >>> >> > and 2
>> >>> >> > pgs inconsistent...
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > In writeback - yes, looks like snapshot works good. but it's stop
>> >>> >> > to
>> >>> >> > work in
>> >>> >> > same moment, when cache layer fulfilled with data and evict/flush
>> >>> >> > started...
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > 2015-08-21 2:09 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> So you started draining the cache pool before you saw either the
>> >>> >> >> inconsistent pgs or the anomalous snap behavior? (That is,
>> >>> >> >> writeback
>> >>> >> >> mode was working correctly?)
>> >>> >> >> -Sam
>> >>> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
>> >>> >> >> <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> > Good joke )))))))))
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> > 2015-08-21 2:06 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> Certainly, don't reproduce this with a cluster you care about
>> >>> >> >> >> :).
>> >>> >> >> >> -Sam
>> >>> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Samuel Just
>> >>> >> >> >> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> >> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> > What's supposed to happen is that the client transparently
>> >>> >> >> >> > directs
>> >>> >> >> >> > all
>> >>> >> >> >> > requests to the cache pool rather than the cold pool when
>> >>> >> >> >> > there
>> >>> >> >> >> > is
>> >>> >> >> >> > a
>> >>> >> >> >> > cache pool. If the kernel is sending requests to the cold
>> >>> >> >> >> > pool,
>> >>> >> >> >> > that's probably where the bug is. Odd. It could also be a
>> >>> >> >> >> > bug
>> >>> >> >> >> > specific 'forward' mode either in the client or on the osd.
>> >>> >> >> >> > Why
>> >>> >> >> >> > did
>> >>> >> >> >> > you have it in that mode?
>> >>> >> >> >> > -Sam
>> >>> >> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Voloshanenko Igor
>> >>> >> >> >> > <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >> We used 4.x branch, as we have "very good" Samsung 850 pro
>> >>> >> >> >> >> in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> production,
>> >>> >> >> >> >> and they don;t support ncq_trim...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> And 4,x first branch which include exceptions for this in
>> >>> >> >> >> >> libsata.c.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> sure we can backport this 1 line to 3.x branch, but we
>> >>> >> >> >> >> prefer
>> >>> >> >> >> >> no
>> >>> >> >> >> >> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >> go
>> >>> >> >> >> >> deeper if packege for new kernel exist.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >> 2015-08-21 1:56 GMT+03:00 Voloshanenko Igor
>> >>> >> >> >> >> <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> root@test:~# uname -a
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> Linux ix-s5 4.0.4-040004-generic #201505171336 SMP Sun
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> May 17
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> 17:37:22
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> UTC
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>> 2015-08-21 1:54 GMT+03:00 Samuel Just <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> Also, can you include the kernel version?
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> -Sam
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Samuel Just
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> <sjust@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > Snapshotting with cache/tiering *is* supposed to work.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > Can
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > you
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > open a
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > bug?
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > -Sam
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Andrija Panic
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> > <andrija.panic@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> This was related to the caching layer, which doesnt
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> support
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> snapshooting per
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> docs...for sake of closing the thread.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> On 17 August 2015 at 21:15, Voloshanenko Igor
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> <igor.voloshanenko@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> wrote:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Hi all, can you please help me with unexplained
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> situation...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> All snapshot inside ceph broken...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> So, as example, we have VM template, as rbd inside
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> We can map it and mount to check that all ok with it
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd0
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd0 print
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Model: Unknown (unknown)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Disk /dev/rbd0: 10.7GB
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Partition Table: msdos
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Number Start End Size Type File system
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Flags
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 1 1049kB 525MB 524MB primary ext4
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> boot
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2 525MB 10.7GB 10.2GB primary
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> lvm
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Than i want to create snap, so i do:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd snap create
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> And now i want to map it:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd1 print
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Warning: Unable to open /dev/rbd1 read-write
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (Read-only
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> file
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> system).
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 has been opened read-only.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Warning: Unable to open /dev/rbd1 read-write
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (Read-only
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> file
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> system).
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1 has been opened read-only.
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Error: /dev/rbd1: unrecognised disk label
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Even md5 different...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@ix-s2:~# md5sum /dev/rbd0
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 9a47797a07fee3a3d71316e22891d752 /dev/rbd0
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@ix-s2:~# md5sum /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> e450f50b9ffa0073fae940ee858a43ce /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Ok, now i protect snap and create clone... but same
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> thing...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> md5 for clone same as for snap,,
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd unmap /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd snap protect
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd clone
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@new_snap
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> cold-storage/test-image
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# rbd map cold-storage/test-image
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# md5sum /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> e450f50b9ffa0073fae940ee858a43ce /dev/rbd1
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> .... but it's broken...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# parted /dev/rbd1 print
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Error: /dev/rbd1: unrecognised disk label
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> =========
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> tech details:
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph -v
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph version 0.94.2
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (5fb85614ca8f354284c713a2f9c610860720bbf3)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> We have 2 inconstistent pgs, but all images not
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> placed
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> on
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> this
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pgs...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph health detail
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> HEALTH_ERR 2 pgs inconsistent; 18 scrub errors
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pg 2.490 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> [56,15,29]
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pg 2.c4 is active+clean+inconsistent, acting
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> [56,10,42]
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 18 scrub errors
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ============
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5' -> pg
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2.74458f70
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (2.770)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> -> up
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ([37,15,14], p37) acting ([37,15,14], p37)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@snap
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@snap' -> pg
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2.793cd4a3
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (2.4a3)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> -> up
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ([12,23,17], p12) acting ([12,23,17], p12)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> root@test:~# ceph osd map cold-storage
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@test-image
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> osdmap e16770 pool 'cold-storage' (2) object
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> '0e23c701-401d-4465-b9b4-c02939d57bb5@test-image' ->
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> pg
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> 2.9519c2a9
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> (2.2a9)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> -> up ([12,44,23], p12) acting ([12,44,23], p12)
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Also we use cache layer, which in current moment -
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> in
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> forward
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> mode...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Can you please help me with this.. As my brain stop
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> to
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> understand
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> what is
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> going on...
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> Thank in advance!
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph-users mailing list
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> --
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> Andrija Panić
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> ceph-users mailing list
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>> >>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>>
>> >>> >> >> >> >>
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>
>
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
