> Op 18 aug. 2015 om 18:15 heeft Jan Schermer <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> het volgende geschreven: > > >> On 18 Aug 2015, at 17:57, Björn Lässig <b.laessig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 08/18/2015 04:32 PM, Jan Schermer wrote: >>> Should ceph care about what scope the address is in? We don't specify it for ipv4 anyway, or is link-scope special in some way? >> >> fe80::/64 is on every ipv6 enabled interface ... thats different from legacy ip. > > I'm not a network guru, but you can have same/overlapping subnets with IPv4 as well > that's why you have scopes, metrics, routing tables, policy routing tables etc. > That's why I'm wondering what's different here. > It's IPv6, that's different. Search for link local, it will tell you what it is. Wido >>> And isn't this the correct syntax actually? >>> >>> cluster_network = fe80::/64%cephnet >> >> That is a very good question! I will look into it. >> >> Björn >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |