Use the order parameter when creating an RBD 22=4MB, 20=1MB From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vickey Singh
Sent: 13 August 2015 09:31
To: Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ceph-users@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Cache tier best practices Thanks Nick for your suggestion. Can you also tell how i can reduce RBD block size to 512K or 1M , do i need to put something in clients ceph.conf ( what parameter i need to set ) On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----Original Message-----
> From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Dominik Zalewski
> Sent: 12 August 2015 14:40
> To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Cache tier best practices
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to hear from people who use cache tier in Ceph about best
> practices and things I should avoid.
>
> I remember hearing that it wasn't that stable back then. Has it changed in
> Hammer release?
It's not so much the stability, but the performance. If your working set will sit mostly in the cache tier and won't tend to change then you might be alright. Otherwise you will find that performance is very poor.
Only tip I can really give is that I have found dropping the RBD block size down to 512kb-1MB helps quite a bit as it makes the cache more effective and also minimises the amount of data transferred on each promotion/flush.
>
> Any tips and tricks are much appreciated!
>
> Thanks
>
> Dominik
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://xo4t.mj.am/link/xo4t/kiv0848/1/dghaYlArR7OxTLu8E96cSA/aHR0cDovL2xpc3RzLmNlcGguY29tL2xpc3RpbmZvLmNnaS9jZXBoLXVzZXJzLWNlcGguY29t
![]()
|
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
