Re: Is it safe to increase pg number in a production environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could someone clarify what the impact of this bug is?
We did increase pg_num/pgp_num and we are on dumpling (0.67.12 unofficial snapshot).
Most of our clients are likely restarted already, but not all. Should we be worried?

Thanks
Jan

> On 11 Aug 2015, at 17:31, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Stefan Priebe <s.priebe@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Am 04.08.2015 um 21:16 schrieb Ketor D:
>>> 
>>> Hi Stefan,
>>>       Could you describe more about the linger ops bug?
>>>       I'm runing Firefly as you say still has this bug.
>> 
>> 
>> It will be fixed in next ff release.
>> 
>> This on:
>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9806
>> 
> 
> Just to clarify one point: it appears that the fix needs to be applied
> on both the OSDs _and_ all clients, right? So all our kvm clients
> would need to be restarted to get firefly 0.80.11 prior to any
> attempted splits. :-(
> 
> Cheers, Dan
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux