On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM, Burkhard Linke <Burkhard.Linke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > > On 07/27/2015 05:42 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Burkhard Linke >> <Burkhard.Linke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> the nfs-ganesha documentation states: >>> >>> "... This FSAL links to a modified version of the CEPH library that has >>> been >>> extended to expose its distributed cluster and replication facilities to >>> the >>> pNFS operations in the FSAL. ... The CEPH library modifications have not >>> been merged into the upstream yet. ...." >>> >>> (https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/wiki/Fsalsupport#ceph) >>> >>> Is this still the case with the hammer release? >> >> The FSAL has been upstream for quite a while, but it's not part of our >> regular testing yet and I'm not sure what it gets from the Ganesha >> side. I'd encourage you to test it, but be wary — we had a recent >> report of some issues we haven't been able to set up to reproduce yet. > > Can you give some details on that issues? I'm currently looking for a way to > provide NFS based access to CephFS to our desktop machines. Ummm...sadly I can't; we don't appear to have any tracker tickets and I'm not sure where the report went to. :( I think it was from Haomai... -Greg > > The kernel NFS implementation in Ubuntu had some problems with CephFS in our > setup, which I was not able to resolve yet. Ganesha seems to be more > promising, since it uses libcephfs directly and does not need a mountpoint > of its own. > > Best regards, > Burkhard _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |