Re: any recommendation of using EnhanceIO?

[Daniel Gryniewicz <dang@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I did some (non-ceph) work on these, and concluded that bcache was the best supported, most stable, and fastest.  This was ~1 year ago, to take it with a grain of salt, but that's what I would recommend.

Daniel

---

From: "Dominik Zalewski" <dzalewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "German Anders" <ganders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2015 5:28:10 PM
Subject: Re: [ceph-users] any recommendation of using EnhanceIO?

Hi,

I’ve asked same question last weeks or so (just search the mailing list archives for EnhanceIO :) and got some interesting answers.

Looks like the project is pretty much dead since it was bought out by HGST. Even their website has some broken links in regards to EnhanceIO

I’m keen to try flashcache or bcache (its been in the mainline kernel for some time)

Dominik

On 1 Jul 2015, at 21:13, German Anders <ganders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi cephers,

   Is anyone out there that implement enhanceIO in a production environment? any recommendation? any perf output to share with the diff between using it and not?

Thanks in advance,

German

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com