Re: Confusion in Erasure Code benchmark app

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

I've observed the same thing but never spent time to figure that out. It would be nice to know. I don't think it's a bug, just something slightly confusing.

Cheers

On 14/07/2015 14:52, Nitin Saxena wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I am trying to debug ceph_erasure_code_benchmark_app available in ceph repo. using cauchy_good technique. I am running gdb using following command:
> 
> src/ceph_erasure_code_benchmark --plugin jerasure_neon --workload encode --iterations 10 --size 1048576 --parameter k=6 --parameter m=2 --parameter directory=src/.libs --parameter packetsize=3072 --parameter technique=cauchy_good
> 
> My confusion here is why underlying GF(32) function galois_w32_region_xor() is called even if the parameter value of w passed in jerasure_schedule_encode() is 8. 
> 
> According to me since GF(8) is passed in jerasure_schedule_encode() (with parameter w==8) then underlying gf function "galois_w8_region_xor()" should have been called instead of GF(32) function galois_w32_region_xor
> 
> Thanks in advance
> Nitin
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux