Yes that was what I meant. Thanks. Was that in a production environment?
Nate Curry
On Jul 10, 2015 11:21 AM, "Quentin Hartman" <qhartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You mean the hardware config? They are older Core2-based servers with 4GB of RAM. Nothing special. I have one running mon and rgw, one running mon and mds, and one run just a mon.QHOn Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 8:58 AM, Nate Curry <curry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:What was your monitor node's configuration when you had multiple ceph daemons running on them?Nate Curry
IT ManagerISSM
Mosaic ATM
mobile: 240.285.7341
office: 571.223.7036 x226
curry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxOn Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Quentin Hartman <qhartman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I have my mons sharing the ceph network, and while I currently do not run mds or rgw, I have run those on my mon hosts in the past with no perceptible ill effects.On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:20 PM, Nate Curry <curry@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:_______________________________________________I have a question in regards to monitor nodes and network layout. Its my understanding that there should be two networks; a ceph only network for comms between the various ceph nodes, and a separate storage network where other systems will interface with the ceph nodes. Are the monitor nodes supposed to straddle both the ceph only network and the storage network or just in the ceph network?Another question is can I run multiple things on the monitor nodes? Like the RADOS GW and the MDS?Thanks,Nate Curry
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com