Further clarification, 12:1 with SATA spinners as the OSD data drives.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:11 AM, David Burley <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is at least one benefit, you can go more dense. In our testing of real workloads, you can get a 12:1 OSD to Journal drive ratio (or even higher) using the P3700. This assumes you are willing to accept the impact of losing 12 OSDs when a journal croaks.On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Andrew Thrift <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:We are running NVMe Intel P3700's as journals for about 8 months now. 1x P3700 per 6x OSD.So far they have been reliable.We are using S3700, S3710 and P3700 as journals and there is _currently_ no real benefit of the P3700 over the SATA units as journals for Ceph.Regards,--
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
