Hi Nigel，
When I use K+M hosts in the EC pool, if M hosts get down, still have K hosts active, Can I continue write data to the pool ? Since there only have K hosts, not K+M hosts, When client write a data to EC pool , Primary OSD will split the data to K data pieces，but how about the M coding pieces? is it still be calculated and where it should be hold ?
--
Yueliang
Sent with Airmail
On June 22, 2015 at 17:08:41, Loic Dachary (loic@xxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: Hi Nigel,
On 22/06/2015 02:52, Nigel Williams wrote:> I recall a post to the mailing list in the last week(s) where someone said that for an EC Pool the failure-domain defaults to having k+m hosts in some versions of Ceph?
>
> Can anyone recall the post? have I got the requirement correct?
Yes.
The default is equivalent to "no two chunks in the same host". When you have K+M chunks, it means you need at least K+M hosts. It is however better to have K+M+1 hosts or more because CRUSH may fail to map otherwise. You can test the mapping as demonstrated at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/blob/master/src/test/cli/crushtool/bad-mappings.t: if it succeeds with this tool, it will also succeed on your actual cluster.
Cheers
--
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
|
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
