All - I have been following this thread for a bit, and am happy to see how involved, capable, and collaborative that this ceph-users community seems to be. It appears there is a fairly strong amount of domain knowledge around the hardware used by many Ceph deployments, with a lot of "thumbs up" and "thumbs down" sort of experience based on bugs, problems, issues, configuration landmines to avoid, etc... Is there somewhere that community experience with hardware like this is being tracked? Not necessarily a full blown HWCL (hardware compability list), but maybe a more cohesive list of controllers, SSD/Spinning disks, and the community lessons learned (like when to or not to use TRIM, silent corruption, etc...)??? It seems like this is all extremely valuable information as "new operators" like my self come in to the picture... Yes, one can mine the email archives ... Thanks! ~~shane On 6/19/15, 9:08 AM, "ceph-users on behalf of Mark Nelson" <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> Would the above change the performance of 530s to be more like 520s? >>> >>> I need to comment that it's *really* not a good idea to do this if you >>> care about data integrity. There's a reason why the 530 is slower than >>> the 520. If you need speed and you care about your data, you should >>> really consider jumping up to the DC S3700. >>> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |