Re: removed_snaps in ceph osd dump?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the answer.
So it doesn’t hurt performance if it grows to ridiculous size - e.g. no lookup table overhead, stat()ing additional files etc.?

Jan

> On 16 Jun 2015, at 11:51, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Every time you delete a snapshot it goes in removed_snaps. The set of
> removed snaps is stored as an interval set, so it uses up two integers
> in the OSDMap for each range.
> There are some patterns of usage that work out badly for this, but
> generally if you're creating snapshots as time goes forward and
> deleting the oldest ones it shouldn't be a problem.
> -Greg
> 
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 1:41 AM, Jan Schermer <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Ping :-)
>> Looks like nobody is bothered by this, can I assume it is normal, doesn’t hurt anything and will grow to millions in time?
>> 
>> Jan
>> 
>> 
>>> On 15 Jun 2015, at 10:32, Jan Schermer <jan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> I have ~1800 removed_snaps listed in the output of “ceph osd dump”.
>>> 
>>> Is that allright? Any way to get rid of those? What’s the significance?
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Jan
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux