Erasure coded pools and bit-rot protection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi All,

I'm testing erasure coded pools. Is there any protection from bit-rot
errors on object read? If I modify one bit in object part (directly on
OSD) I'm getting *broken*object:

    mon-01:~ # rados --pool ecpool get `hostname -f`_16 - | md5sum
    bb2d82bbb95be6b9a039d135cc7a5d0d  -

    # modify one bit directly on OSD

    mon-01:~ # rados --pool ecpool get `hostname -f`_16 - | md5sum
    02f04f590010b4b0e6af4741c4097b4f  -

    # restore bit to original value

    mon-01:~ # rados --pool ecpool get `hostname -f`_16 - | md5sum
    bb2d82bbb95be6b9a039d135cc7a5d0d  -

If I run deep-scrub on modified bit I'm getting inconsistent PG which is
correct in this case. After restoring bit and running deep-scrub again
all PGs are clean.


[ceph version 0.94.1 (e4bfad3a3c51054df7e537a724c8d0bf9be972ff)]
   

-- 
PS
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux