straw vs straw2 mapping differences

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I took a bit of time to get a feel for how different the straw2 mappings are vs straw1 mappings.  For a bucket in which all weights are the same, I saw no changed mappings, which is as expected.  However, on a map with 3 hosts each of which has 4 osds with weights 1,2,3, and 4 (crush-different-weight.straw), 1360/10000 mappings wind up different.  Some good news is that this effect is smaller with smaller weight differences.  When the osd weights are 1, 1.1, 1.2, and 1.3 (crush-different-weight-close.straw), only 377/10000 single osd mappings are different.  I've attached a tarball with a script for reproducing the results and the maps I tested.
-Sam

Attachment: strawtest.tgz
Description: application/compressed-tar

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux