Yes, so it seems. The librados::nobjects_begin() call expects at least a Hammer (0.94) backend. Probably need to add a try/catch there to catch this issue, and maybe see if using a different api would be better compatible with older backends. Yehuda ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Anthony Alba" <ascanio.alba7@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Ben" <b@benjackson.email>, "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 10:14:38 AM > Subject: Re: Shadow Files > > Unfortunately it immediately aborted (running against a 0.80.9 Ceph). > Does Ceph also have to be a 0.94 level? > > last error was > -3> 2015-05-06 01:11:11.710947 7f311dd15880 0 run(): building > index of all objects in pool > -2> 2015-05-06 01:11:11.710995 7f311dd15880 1 -- > 10.200.3.92:0/1001510 --> 10.200.3.32:6800/1870 -- > osd_op(client.4065115.0:27 ^A/ [pgnls start_epoch 0] 11.0 ack+read > +known_if_redirected e952) v5 -- ?+0 0x39a4e80 con 0x39a4aa0 > -1> 2015-05-06 01:11:11.712125 7f31026f4700 1 -- > 10.200.3.92:0/1001510 <== osd.1 10.200.3.32:6800/1870 1 ==== > osd_op_reply(27 [pgnls start_epoch 0] v934'6252 uv6252 > ondisk = -22 ((22) Invalid argument)) v6 ==== 167+0+0 (3260127617 0 0) > 0x7f30c4000a90 con 0x39a4aa0 > 0> 2015-05-06 01:11:11.712652 7f311dd15880 -1 *** Caught signal > (Aborted) ** > in thread 7f311dd15880 > > > > > > 2015-05-06 01:11:11.710947 7f311dd15880 0 run(): building index of > all objects in pool > terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' > what(): rados returned (22) Invalid argument > *** Caught signal (Aborted) ** > in thread 7f311dd15880 > ceph version 0.94-1339-gc905d51 (c905d517c2c778a88b006302996591b60d167cb6) > 1: radosgw-admin() [0x61e604] > 2: (()+0xf130) [0x7f311a59f130] > 3: (gsignal()+0x37) [0x7f31195d85d7] > 4: (abort()+0x148) [0x7f31195d9cc8] > 5: (__gnu_cxx::__verbose_terminate_handler()+0x165) [0x7f3119edc9b5] > 6: (()+0x5e926) [0x7f3119eda926] > 7: (()+0x5e953) [0x7f3119eda953] > 8: (()+0x5eb73) [0x7f3119edab73] > 9: (()+0x4d116) [0x7f311b606116] > 10: (librados::IoCtx::nobjects_begin()+0x2e) [0x7f311b60c60e] > 11: (RGWOrphanSearch::build_all_oids_index()+0x62) [0x516a02] > 12: (RGWOrphanSearch::run()+0x1e3) [0x51ad23] > 13: (main()+0xa430) [0x4fbc30] > 14: (__libc_start_main()+0xf5) [0x7f31195c4af5] > 15: radosgw-admin() [0x5028d9] > 2015-05-06 01:11:11.712652 7f311dd15880 -1 *** Caught signal (Aborted) ** > in thread 7f311dd15880 > > ceph version 0.94-1339-gc905d51 (c905d517c2c778a88b006302996591b60d167cb6) > 1: radosgw-admin() [0x61e604] > 2: (()+0xf130) [0x7f311a59f130] > > > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub > <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Can you try creating the .log pool? > > > > Yehda > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Anthony Alba" <ascanio.alba7@xxxxxxxxx> > >> To: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> Cc: "Ben" <b@benjackson.email>, "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Tuesday, May 5, 2015 3:37:15 AM > >> Subject: Re: Shadow Files > >> > >> ...sorry clicked send to quickly > >> > >> /opt/ceph/bin/radosgw-admin orphans find --pool=.rgw.buckets --job-id=abcd > >> ERROR: failed to open log pool ret=-2 > >> job not found > >> > >> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 6:36 PM, Anthony Alba <ascanio.alba7@xxxxxxxxx> > >> wrote: > >> > Hi Yehuda, > >> > > >> > First run: > >> > > >> > /opt/ceph/bin/radosgw-admin --pool=.rgw.buckets --job-id=testing > >> > ERROR: failed to open log pool ret=-2 > >> > job not found > >> > > >> > Do I have to precreate some pool? > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub > >> > <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> I've been working on a new tool that would detect leaked rados objects. > >> >> It > >> >> will take some time for it to be merged into an official release, or > >> >> even > >> >> into the master branch, but if anyone likes to play with it, it is in > >> >> the > >> >> wip-rgw-orphans branch. > >> >> > >> >> At the moment I recommend to not remove any object that the tool > >> >> reports, > >> >> but rather move it to a different pool for backup (using the rados tool > >> >> cp command). > >> >> > >> >> The tool works in a few stages: > >> >> (1) list all the rados objects in the specified pool, store in > >> >> repository > >> >> (2) list all bucket instances in the system, store in repository > >> >> (3) iterate through bucket instances in repository, list (logical) > >> >> objects, for each object store the expected rados objects that build it > >> >> (4) compare data from (1) and (3), each object that is in (1), but not > >> >> in > >> >> (3), stat, if older than $start_time - $stale_period, report it > >> >> > >> >> There can be lot's of things that can go wrong with this, so we really > >> >> need to be careful here. > >> >> > >> >> The tool can be run by the following command: > >> >> > >> >> $ radosgw-admin orphans find --pool=<data pool> --job-id=<name> > >> >> [--num-shards=<num shards>] [--orphan-stale-secs=<seconds>] > >> >> > >> >> The tool can be stopped, and restarted, and it will continue from the > >> >> stage where it stopped. Note that some of the stages will restart from > >> >> the beginning (of the stages), due to system limitation (specifically > >> >> 1, > >> >> 2). > >> >> > >> >> In order to clean up a job's data: > >> >> > >> >> $ radosgw-admin orphans finish --job-id=<name> > >> >> > >> >> Note that the jobs run in the radosgw-admin process context, it does > >> >> not > >> >> schedule a job on the radosgw process. > >> >> > >> >> Please let me know of any issue you find. > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Yehuda > >> >> > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>> From: "Ben Hines" <bhines@xxxxxxxxx> > >> >>> To: "Ben" <b@benjackson.email> > >> >>> Cc: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx>, "ceph-users" > >> >>> <ceph-users@xxxxxxxx> > >> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 3:00:16 PM > >> >>> Subject: Re: Shadow Files > >> >>> > >> >>> Going to hold off on our 94.1 update for this issue > >> >>> > >> >>> Hopefully this can make it into a 94.2 or a v95 git release. > >> >>> > >> >>> -Ben > >> >>> > >> >>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ben < b@benjackson.email > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> How long are you thinking here? > >> >>> > >> >>> We added more storage to our cluster to overcome these issues, and we > >> >>> can't > >> >>> keep throwing storage at it until the issues are fixed. > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> On 28/04/15 01:49, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> It will get to the ceph mainline eventually. We're still reviewing and > >> >>> testing the fix, and there's more work to be done on the cleanup tool. > >> >>> > >> >>> Yehuda > >> >>> > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> From: "Ben" <b@benjackson.email> > >> >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" < yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Cc: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@xxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 11:02:23 PM > >> >>> Subject: Re: Shadow Files > >> >>> > >> >>> Are these fixes going to make it into the repository versions of ceph, > >> >>> or will we be required to compile and install manually? > >> >>> > >> >>> On 2015-04-26 02:29, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> Yeah, that's definitely something that we'd address soon. > >> >>> > >> >>> Yehuda > >> >>> > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> From: "Ben" <b@benjackson.email> > >> >>> To: "Ben Hines" < bhines@xxxxxxxxx >, "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" > >> >>> < yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Cc: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@xxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 5:14:11 PM > >> >>> Subject: Re: Shadow Files > >> >>> > >> >>> Definitely need something to help clear out these old shadow files. > >> >>> > >> >>> I'm sure our cluster has around 100TB of these shadow files. > >> >>> > >> >>> I've written a script to go through known objects to get prefixes of > >> >>> objects > >> >>> that should exist to compare to ones that shouldn't, but the time it > >> >>> takes > >> >>> to do this over millions and millions of objects is just too long. > >> >>> > >> >>> On 25/04/15 09:53, Ben Hines wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> When these are fixed it would be great to get good steps for listing / > >> >>> cleaning up any orphaned objects. I have suspicions this is affecting > >> >>> us. > >> >>> > >> >>> thanks- > >> >>> > >> >>> -Ben > >> >>> > >> >>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub < > >> >>> yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> These ones: > >> >>> > >> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10295 > >> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11447 > >> >>> > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> From: "Ben Jackson" <b@benjackson.email> > >> >>> To: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" < yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Cc: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@xxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 3:06:02 PM > >> >>> Subject: Re: Shadow Files > >> >>> > >> >>> We were firefly, then we upgraded to giant, now we are on hammer. > >> >>> > >> >>> What issues? > >> >>> > >> >>> On 25 Apr 2015 2:12 am, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub < yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> What version are you running? There are two different issues that we > >> >>> were > >> >>> fixing this week, and we should have that upstream pretty soon. > >> >>> > >> >>> Yehuda > >> >>> > >> >>> ----- Original Message ----- > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> From: "Ben" <b@benjackson.email> > >> >>> To: "ceph-users" < ceph-users@xxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Cc: "Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub" < yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx > > >> >>> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 7:42:06 PM > >> >>> Subject: Shadow Files > >> >>> > >> >>> We are still experiencing a problem with out gateway not properly > >> >>> clearing out shadow files. > >> >>> > >> >>> I have done numerous tests where I have: > >> >>> -Uploaded a file of 1.5GB in size using s3browser application > >> >>> -Done an object stat on the file to get its prefix > >> >>> -Done rados ls -p .rgw.buckets | grep <prefix> to count the number > >> >>> of > >> >>> shadow files associated (in this case it is around 290 shadow files) > >> >>> -Deleted said file with s3browser > >> >>> -Performed a gc list, which shows the ~290 files listed > >> >>> -Waited 24 hours to redo the rados ls -p .rgw.buckets | grep > >> >>> <prefix> > >> >>> to > >> >>> recount the shadow files only to be left with 290 files still there > >> >>> > >> >>> From log output /var/log/ceph/radosgw.log, I can see the following > >> >>> when > >> >>> clicking DELETE (this appears 290 times) > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996523 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=4718592 stripe_ofs=4718592 part_ofs=0 rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996557 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=8912896 stripe_ofs=8912896 part_ofs=0 rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996564 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs= 13107200 stripe_ofs= 13107200 part_ofs=0 > >> >>> rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996570 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=17301504 stripe_ofs=17301504 part_ofs=0 > >> >>> rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996576 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=21495808 stripe_ofs=21495808 part_ofs=0 > >> >>> rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996581 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=25690112 stripe_ofs=25690112 part_ofs=0 > >> >>> rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996586 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=29884416 stripe_ofs=29884416 part_ofs=0 > >> >>> rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> 2015-04-24 10:43:29.996592 7f0b0afb5700 0 > >> >>> RGWObjManifest::operator++(): > >> >>> result: ofs=34078720 stripe_ofs=34078720 part_ofs=0 > >> >>> rule->part_size=0 > >> >>> > >> >>> In this same log, I also see the gc process saying it is removing > >> >>> said > >> >>> file (these records appear 290 times too) > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.926952 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.928572 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.929636 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.930448 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.931226 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.932103 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> 2015-04-23 14:16:27.933470 7f15be0ee700 0 gc::process: removing > >> >>> .rgw.buckets:<objectname> > >> >>> > >> >>> So even though it appears that the GC is processing its removal, the > >> >>> shadow files remain! > >> >>> > >> >>> Please help! > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> _______________________________________________ > >> >>> ceph-users mailing list > >> >>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> >>> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> ceph-users mailing list > >> >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> _______________________________________________ > >> ceph-users mailing list > >> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > >> > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |