Re: NVMe Journal and Mixing IO

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On Wed, 15 Apr 2015 10:26:37 +0200 Atze de Vries wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> We are designing a new Ceph cluster. Some of the cluster wil be used to
> run vms and most of it wil be used for file storage and object storage.
> We want to separate the workload for vms (high IO / small block) from the
> bulk storage (big block lots of latency) since mixing IO seems to be a
> bad idea.
> 
I assume different pools with differently backed OSDs then?

> The new NVMe disks (for example Intel P3600 or P3700) can handle 64K
> queues with 64K commands each while AHCI can handle 1 queue with 32
> commands.
> 
NVMe indeed addresses that shortcoming of AHCI nicely.

> Would the performance loss from mixing IO be less if you would use NVMe
> disks?
> 
I encourage you to read all the various SSD cluster performance threads
here.

In short, you're likely to run out of CPU for IOPS long before scratching
the IOPS potential of these NVMe SSDs.

Christian
-- 
Christian Balzer        Network/Systems Engineer                
chibi@xxxxxxx   	Global OnLine Japan/Fusion Communications
http://www.gol.com/
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux