I could really use some eyes on the systemd change proposed here: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11344 Specifically, on bullet #4 there, should we have a single "ceph-mon.service" (implying that users should only run one monitor daemon per server) or if we should support multiple "ceph-mon@" services (implying that users will need to specify additional information when starting the service(s)). The version in our tree is "ceph-mon@". James' work for Ubuntu Vivid is only "ceph-mon" [2]. Same thing for ceph-mds vs ceph-mds@. I'd prefer to keep Ubuntu downstream the same as Ceph upstream. What do we want to do for this? How common is it to run multiple monitor daemons or mds daemons on a single host? - Ken [1] https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/master/systemd [2] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-branches/ubuntu/vivid/ceph/vivid/files/head:/debian/lib-systemd/ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |