----- Original Message ----- > From: "Francois Lafont" <flafdivers@xxxxxxx> > To: ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:11:49 PM > Subject: Re: Radosgw: upgrade Firefly to Hammer, impossible to create bucket > > Hi, > > Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote: > > > The 405 in this case usually means that rgw failed to translate the http > > hostname header into > > a bucket name. Do you have 'rgw dns name' set correctly? > > Ah, I have found and indeed it concerned "rgw dns name" as also Karan > thought. ;) > But it's a little curious. Explanations: > > My s3cmd client use these hostnames (which are well resolved with the IP > address > of the radosgw host): > > <bucket-name>.ostore.athome.priv > > And in the configuration of my radosgw, I had: > > --------------------------------------- > [client.radosgw.gw1] > host = ceph-radosgw1 > rgw dns name = ostore > ... > --------------------------------------- > > ie just the *short* name of the radosgw's fqdn (its fqdn is > ostore.athome.priv). > And with Firefly, it worked well, I never had problem with this > configuration! > But with Hammer, it doesn't work anymore (I don't know why). Now, with > Hammer, > I just notice that I have to put the fqdn in "rgw dns name" not the short > name: > > --------------------------------------- > [client.radosgw.gw1] > host = ceph-radosgw1 > rgw dns name = ostore.athome.priv > ... > --------------------------------------- > > And with this configuration, it works. > > Is it normal? In fact, maybe my configuration with the short name (instead of > the > fqdn) was not valid and I just was lucky it work well so far. Is it the good > conclusion > of the story? > > In fact, I think I never have well understood the meaning of the "rgw dns > name" > parameter. Can you confirm to me (or not) this: > > This parameter is *only* used when a S3 client accesses to a bucket with > the method http://<bucket-name>.<radosgw-address>. If we don't set this > parameter, such access will not work and a S3 client could access to a > bucket only with the method http://<radosgw-address>/<bucket-name> > > Is it correct? Yes. Not sure why it *was* working in firefly. We did do some work around this in hammer, might have changed the behavior inadvertently. Yehuda > > Thx Yehuda and thx to Karan (who has pointed the real problem in fact ;)). > > -- > François Lafont > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |