On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 7:20 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Okay, but 118/85 = 1.38. You say you're seeing variance from 53% > utilization to 96%, and 53%*1.38 = 73.5%, which is *way* off your > numbers. 53% to 96% is with all weights set to default (i.e. disk size) and all reweights set to 1. (I.e. before reweight-by-utilization and many hours of hand-tuning). > But it might just be faster to look for > anomalies within the size of important bits on the OSD — leveldb > stores, etc that don't correspond to the PG count). That would only work if I understood what you said and knew how to do it. :) Thanks! _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |