Yes I read it and do no not understand what you mean when say
*verify this*? All 3335808 inodes are definetly files and direcories created by ceph OSD process: tune2fs 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012) Filesystem volume name: <none> Last mounted on: /var/lib/ceph/tmp/mnt.05NAJ3 Filesystem UUID: e4dcca8a-7b68-4f60-9b10-c164dc7f9e33 Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash Default mount options: user_xattr acl Filesystem state: clean Errors behavior: Continue Filesystem OS type: Linux Inode count: 3335808 Block count: 13342945 Reserved block count: 667147 Free blocks: 5674105 Free inodes: 0 First block: 0 Block size: 4096 Fragment size: 4096 Reserved GDT blocks: 1020 Blocks per group: 32768 Fragments per group: 32768 Inodes per group: 8176 Inode blocks per group: 511 Flex block group size: 16 Filesystem created: Fri Feb 20 16:44:25 2015 Last mount time: Tue Mar 24 09:33:19 2015 Last write time: Tue Mar 24 09:33:27 2015 Mount count: 7 Maximum mount count: -1 Last checked: Fri Feb 20 16:44:25 2015 Check interval: 0 (<none>) Lifetime writes: 4116 GB Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) First inode: 11 Inode size: 256 Required extra isize: 28 Desired extra isize: 28 Journal inode: 8 Default directory hash: half_md4 Directory Hash Seed: 148ee5dd-7ee0-470c-a08a-b11c318ff90b Journal backup: inode blocks fsck.ext4 /dev/sda1 e2fsck 1.42.5 (29-Jul-2012) /dev/sda1: clean, 3335808/3335808 files, 7668840/13342945 blocks 23.03.2015 17:09, Christian Balzer
пишет:
On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 15:26:07 +0300 Kamil Kuramshin wrote:Yes, I understand that. The initial purpose of first email was just an advise for new comers. My fault was in that I was selected ext4 for SSD disks as backend. But I did not foresee that inode number can reach its limit before the free space :) And maybe there must be some sort of warning not only for free space in MiBs(GiBs,TiBs) and there must be dedicated warning about free inodes for filesystems with static inode allocation like ext4. Because if OSD reach inode limit it becames totally unusable and immediately goes down, and from that moment there is no way to start it!While all that is true and should probably be addressed, please re-read what I wrote before. With the 3.3 million inodes used and thus likely as many files (did you verify this?) and 4MB objects that would make something in the 12TB ballpark area. Something very very strange and wrong is going on with your cache tier. Christian23.03.2015 13:42, Thomas Foster пишет:You could fix this by changing your block size when formatting the mount-point with the mkfs -b command. I had this same issue when dealing with the filesystem using glusterfs and the solution is to either use a filesystem that allocates inodes automatically or change the block size when you build the filesystem. Unfortunately, the only way to fix the problem that I have seen is to reformat On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:51 AM, Kamil Kuramshin <kamil.kuramshin@xxxxxxxx <mailto:kamil.kuramshin@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: In my case there was cache pool for ec-pool serving RBD-images, and object size is 4Mb, and client was an /kernel-rbd /client each SSD disk is 60G disk, 2 disk per node, 6 nodes in total = 12 OSDs in total 23.03.2015 12:00, Christian Balzer пишет:Hello, This is rather confusing, as cache-tiers are just normal OSDs/pools and thus should have Ceph objects of around 4MB in size by default. This is matched on what I see with Ext4 here (normal OSD, not a cache tier): --- size: /dev/sde1 2.7T 204G 2.4T 8% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0 inodes: /dev/sde1 183148544 55654 183092890 1% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0 --- On a more fragmented cluster I see a 5:1 size to inode ratio. I just can't fathom how there could be 3.3 million inodes (and thus a close number of files) using 30G, making the average file size below 10 Bytes. Something other than your choice of file system is probably at play here. How fragmented are those SSDs? What's your default Ceph object size? Where _are_ those 3 million files in that OSD, are they actually in the object files like: -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4194304 Jan 9 15:27 /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-0/current/3.117_head/DIR_7/DIR_1/DIR_5/rb.0.23a8f.238e1f29.000000027632__head_C4F3D517__3 What's your use case, RBD, CephFS, RadosGW? Regards, Christian On Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:32:55 +0300 Kamil Kuramshin wrote:Recently got a problem with OSDs based on SSD disks used in cache tier for EC-pool superuser@node02:~$ df -i Filesystem Inodes IUsed *IFree* IUse% Mounted on <...> /dev/sdb1 3335808 3335808 *0* 100% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45 /dev/sda1 3335808 3335808 *0* 100% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-46 Now that OSDs are down on each ceph-node and cache tiering is not working. superuser@node01:~$ sudo tail /var/log/ceph/ceph-osd.45.log 2015-03-23 10:04:23.631137 7fb105345840 0 ceph version 0.87.1 (283c2e7cfa2457799f534744d7d549f83ea1335e), process ceph-osd, pid 1453465 2015-03-23 10:04:23.640676 7fb105345840 0 filestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) backend generic (magic 0xef53) 2015-03-23 10:04:23.640735 7fb105345840 -1 genericfilestorebackend(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) detect_features: unable to create /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45/fiemap_test: (28) No space left on device 2015-03-23 10:04:23.640763 7fb105345840 -1 filestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) _detect_fs: detect_features error: (28) No space left on device 2015-03-23 10:04:23.640772 7fb105345840 -1 filestore(/var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45) FileStore::mount : error in _detect_fs: (28) No space left on device 2015-03-23 10:04:23.640783 7fb105345840 -1 ** ERROR: error converting store /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45: (28) *No space left on device* In the same time*df -h *is confusing: superuser@node01:~$ df -h Filesystem Size Used *Avail* Use% Mounted on <...> /dev/sda1 50G 29G *20G* 60% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-45 /dev/sdb1 50G 27G *21G* 56% /var/lib/ceph/osd/ceph-46 Filesystem used on affected OSDs is EXt4. All OSDs are deployed with ceph-deploy: $ ceph-deploy osd create --zap-disk --fs-type ext4 <node-name>:<device> Help me out what it was just test deployment and all EC-pool data was lost since I /can't start OSDs/ and ceph cluster/becames degraded /until I removed all affected tiered pools (cache & EC) So this is just my observation of what kind of problems can be faced if you choose wrong Filesystem for OSD backend. And now I *strongly* recommend you to choose*XFS* or *Btrfs* filesystems because both are supporting dynamic inode allocation and this problem can't arise with them._______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com |
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com