Does crushtool --test --simulate do what cluster should do?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm trying to create a CRUSH ruleset and I'm using crushtool to test
the rules, but it doesn't seem to mapping things correctly. I have two
roots, on for spindles and another for SSD. I have two rules, one for
each root. The output of crushtool on rule 0 shows objects being
mapped to SSD OSDs when it should only be choosing spindles.

I'm pretty sure I'm doing something wrong. I've tested the map on .93 and .80.8.

The map is at http://pastebin.com/BjmuASX0

when running

crushtool -i map.crush --test --num-rep 3 --rule 0 --simulate --show-mappings

I'm getting mapping to OSDs > 39 which are SSDs. The same happens when
I run the SSD rule, I get OSDs from both roots. It is as if crushtool
is not selecting the correct root. In fact both rules result in the
same mapping:

RNG rule 0 x 0 [0,38,23]
RNG rule 0 x 1 [10,25,1]
RNG rule 0 x 2 [11,40,0]
RNG rule 0 x 3 [5,30,26]
RNG rule 0 x 4 [44,30,10]
RNG rule 0 x 5 [8,26,16]
RNG rule 0 x 6 [24,5,36]
RNG rule 0 x 7 [38,10,9]
RNG rule 0 x 8 [39,9,23]
RNG rule 0 x 9 [12,3,24]
RNG rule 0 x 10 [18,6,41]
...

RNG rule 1 x 0 [0,38,23]
RNG rule 1 x 1 [10,25,1]
RNG rule 1 x 2 [11,40,0]
RNG rule 1 x 3 [5,30,26]
RNG rule 1 x 4 [44,30,10]
RNG rule 1 x 5 [8,26,16]
RNG rule 1 x 6 [24,5,36]
RNG rule 1 x 7 [38,10,9]
RNG rule 1 x 8 [39,9,23]
RNG rule 1 x 9 [12,3,24]
RNG rule 1 x 10 [18,6,41]
...


Thanks,
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux