Re: CephFS questions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/03/2015 19:00, Bogdan SOLGA wrote:

  * is the http://ceph.com/docs/master/cephfs/ page referring to the
    current release version (Giant) or to the HEAD (Hammer) version?
    if it's referring to Giant -- are there any major improvements and
    fixes for CephFS included in the (upcoming) Hammer release?

The clue is in the URL - that link is built from the latest code in git ("master"). Substitute hammer/giant to get the docs from a particular version. Yes, there are lots of fixes in hammer. If you're evaluating CephFS you should always use the most recent release you can.

  * the 'one filesystem per Ceph cluster' sounds like a (possible)
    drawback, from the flexibility point of view. Is this something
    which will be (or is currently) worked on?

There have been steps in that direction (notably the "fs ls" command which currently only lists one...). Many people are also interested in multi-tenancy implemented as finer grained access controls within a filesystem (i.e. rather than having two filesystems, export two directories from one).

John
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux