For all intents and purposes, centos and rhel are equivalent, so I'd not be too concerned about that distinction. I can't comment as to which distro is better tested by ceph devs, but assuming that the packages are built appropriately with similar dependency versions and whatnot, that also shouldn't matter much, though distro-specific bugs are certainly a thing they are generally a rare thing aside from packaging quirks.
In my experience the biggest differentiator by distro for the quality of a deployed service is the skill of the people administering it. In other words, deploy on the one your ops team knows better. Everything else will come out in the wash.
QH
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Alexandre DERUMIER <aderumier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
I'll build my full ssd production soon,
I wonder which distrib is best tested with inktank and ceph team ?
ceph.com doc is quite old, and don't have reference for giant or hammer
http://ceph.com/docs/master/start/os-recommendations/
Seem than in past only ubuntu and rhel was well tested,
not sure about centos.
Regards,
Alexandre
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
