Re: Doesn't Support Qcow2 Disk images

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12 Mar 2015 12:49:51 PM Vieresjoki, Juha wrote:
> But there's really no point, block storage is the only viable option for
> virtual machines performance-wise. With images you're dealing with multiple
> filesystem layers on top of the actual block devices, plus Ceph as block
> storage supports pretty much everything that qcow2 as a format does.


Not much difference that I've noticed on the small system I run, in fact cepfs 
seems to do some caching which speeds up things considerably in benchmarks. 
Not a huge difference in actual app performance that I've noticed.

Delete/Restore of snapshots is a lot quicker with qcow2 and for somereasons 
saving memory state is orders of magnitude quicker with qcow2.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux