Rebalance/Backfill Throtling - anything missing here?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



HI Guys,

I yesterday removed 1 OSD from cluster (out of 42 OSDs), and it caused over 37% od the data to rebalance - let's say this is fine (this is when I removed it frm Crush Map).

I'm wondering - I have previously set some throtling mechanism, but during first 1h of rebalancing, my rate of recovery was going up to 1500 MB/s - and VMs were unusable completely, and then last 4h of the duration of recover this recovery rate went down to, say, 100-200 MB.s and during this VM performance was still pretty impacted, but at least I could work more or a less

So my question, is this behaviour expected, is throtling here working as expected, since first 1h was almoust no throtling applied if I check the recovery rate 1500MB/s and the impact on Vms.
And last 4h seemed pretty fine (although still lot of impact in general)

I changed these throtling on the fly with:

ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_recovery_max_active 1'
ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_recovery_op_priority 1'
ceph tell osd.* injectargs '--osd_max_backfills 1'

My Jorunals are on SSDs (12 OSD per server, of which 6 journals on one SSD, 6 journals on another SSD)  - I have 3 of these hosts.

Any thought are welcome.
--

Andrija Panić
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux