On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:50 AM, Luis Periquito <periquito@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Hi Dan, >> >> I remember http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9945 introducing some issues with >> running cephfs between different versions of giant/firefly. >> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg14257.html > > Hmm, yeah, that's been fixed for a while but is still waiting to go > out in the next point release. :( > > Beyond this bug, although the MDS doesn't have any new OSD > dependencies that could break things, we don't test cross-version > stuff like that at all except during upgrades. Some minimal testing on > your side should be enough to make sure it works, but if I were you > I'd try it on a test cluster first — the MDS is reporting a lot more > to the monitors in Giant and Hammer than it did in Firefly, and > everything should be good but there might be issues lurking in the > compatibility checks there. > -Greg Thanks Greg, I'll definitely keep this on a test instance. I'll report back if I find anything interesting... Cheers, Dan _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |