Re: Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nice Work Mark !

I don't see any tuning about sharding in the config file sample

(osd_op_num_threads_per_shard,osd_op_num_shards,...)

as you only use 1 ssd for the bench, I think it should improve results for hammer ?



----- Mail original -----
De: "Mark Nelson" <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>
À: "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "ceph-users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Envoyé: Mardi 17 Février 2015 18:37:01
Objet:  Ceph Dumpling/Firefly/Hammer SSD/Memstore performance	comparison

Hi All, 

I wrote up a short document describing some tests I ran recently to look 
at how SSD backed OSD performance has changed across our LTS releases. 
This is just looking at RADOS performance and not RBD or RGW. It also 
doesn't offer any real explanations regarding the results. It's just a 
first high level step toward understanding some of the behaviors folks 
on the mailing list have reported over the last couple of releases. I 
hope you find it useful. 

Mark 

_______________________________________________ 
ceph-users mailing list 
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com 
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux