On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 6:55 PM ZHOU Yuan <dunk007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Greg, that's a awesome feature I missed. I find some
explanation on the watch-notify thing:
http://www.slideshare.net/Inktank_Ceph/sweil-librados.
Just want to confirm, it looks like I need to list all the RGW
instances in ceph.conf, and then these RGW instances will
automatically do the cache invalidation if necessary?
Sincerely, Yuan
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Gregory Farnum <greg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 6:40 PM, ZHOU Yuan <dunk007@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm trying to understand the RGW cache consistency model. My Ceph
>> cluster has multiple RGW instances with HAProxy as the load balancer.
>> HAProxy would choose one RGW instance to serve the request(with
>> round-robin).
>> The question is if RGW cache was enabled, which is the default
>> behavior, there seem to be some cache inconsistency issue. e.g.,
>> object0 was cached in RGW-0 and RGW-1 at the same time. Sometime later
>> it was updated from RGW-0. In this case if the next read was issued to
>> RGW-1, the outdated cache would be served out then since RGW-1 wasn't
>> aware of the updates. Thus the data would be inconsistent. Is this
>> behavior expected or is there anything I missed?
>
> The RGW instances make use of the watch-notify primitive to keep their
> caches consistent. It shouldn't be a problem.
> -Greg
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
