Re: Weights: Hosts vs. OSDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hey Lindsay,

Lindsay Mathieson [Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 06:23:10AM +1000]:
> On Tue, 30 Dec 2014 05:07:31 PM Nico Schottelius wrote:
> > While writing this I noted that the relation / factor is exactly 5.5 times
> > wrong, so I *guess* that ceph treats all hosts with the same weight (even
> > though it looks differently to me in the osd tree and the crushmap)?
> 
> I believe If you have the default replication factor of 3, then with 3 hosts 
> you will effectively  have a weight of 1 per host no matter what you specify 
> because ceph will be forced to place a copy of all data on each host to 
> satisfy replication requirements.

sorry, I forgot to mention we are using size = 2.

Cheers,

Nico

-- 
New PGP key: 659B 0D91 E86E 7E24 FD15  69D0 C729 21A1 293F 2D24

Attachment: pgpJdS3n3zjtk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux