Re: Improving Performance with more OSD's?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:12:06 PM Christian Balzer wrote:
> Is that a private cluster network just between Ceph storage nodes or is
> this for all ceph traffic (including clients)?
> The later would probably be better, a private cluster network twice as
> fast as the client one isn't particular helpful 99% of the time.


The later - all ceph traffic including clients (qemu rbd).

> > 3rd Node
> > 
> >  - Monitor only, for quorum
> > 
> > - Intel Nuc
> > - 8GB RAM
> > - CPU: Celeron N2820
> 
> Uh oh, a bit weak for a monitor. Where does the OS live (on this and the
> other nodes)? The leveldb (/var/lib/ceph/..) of the monitors likes it fast,
> SSDs preferably.

On a SSD (all the nodes have OS on SSD).

Looks like I misunderstood the purpose of the monitors, I presumed they were 
just for monitoring node health. They do more than that?


> The closer it is to the current storage nodes, the better.
> The slowest OSD in a cluster can impede all (most of) the others.

Closer as in similar hardware specs?




-- 
Lindsay

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux