The branch I pushed earlier was based off recent development branch. I just pushed one based off firefly (wip-10271-firefly). It will probably take a bit to build. Yehuda On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:03 PM, Georgios Dimitrakakis <giorgis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi again! > > I have installed and enabled the development branch repositories as > described here: > > http://ceph.com/docs/master/install/get-packages/#add-ceph-development > > and when I try to update the ceph-radosgw package I get the following: > > Installed Packages > Name : ceph-radosgw > Arch : x86_64 > Version : 0.80.7 > Release : 0.el6 > Size : 3.8 M > Repo : installed > From repo : Ceph > Summary : Rados REST gateway > URL : http://ceph.com/ > License : GPL-2.0 > Description : radosgw is an S3 HTTP REST gateway for the RADOS object store. > It is > : implemented as a FastCGI module using libfcgi, and can be used > in > : conjunction with any FastCGI capable web server. > > Available Packages > Name : ceph-radosgw > Arch : x86_64 > Epoch : 1 > Version : 0.80.5 > Release : 9.el6 > Size : 1.3 M > Repo : epel > Summary : Rados REST gateway > URL : http://ceph.com/ > License : GPL-2.0 > Description : radosgw is an S3 HTTP REST gateway for the RADOS object store. > It is > : implemented as a FastCGI module using libfcgi, and can be used > in > : conjunction with any FastCGI capable web server. > > > > Is this normal??? > > I am concerned because the installed version is 0.80.7 and the available > update package is 0.80.5 > > Have I missed something? > > Regards, > > George > > > >> Pushed a fix to wip-10271. Haven't tested it though, let me know if >> you try it. >> >> Thanks, >> Yehuda >> >> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 8:38 AM, Yehuda Sadeh <yehuda@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> I don't think it has been fixed recently. I'm looking at it now, and >>> not sure why it hasn't triggered before in other areas. >>> >>> Yehuda >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:55 AM, Georgios Dimitrakakis >>> <giorgis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>> This issue seems very similar to these: >>>> >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8202 >>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/8702 >>>> >>>> >>>> Would it make any difference if I try to build CEPH from sources? >>>> >>>> I mean is someone aware of it been fixed on any of the recent commits >>>> and >>>> probably hasn't passed yet to the repositories? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> George >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:47:59 +0200, Georgios Dimitrakakis wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I 've just created issues #10271 >>>>> >>>>> Best, >>>>> >>>>> George >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, 5 Dec 2014 09:30:45 -0800, Yehuda Sadeh wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> It looks like a bug. Can you open an issue on tracker.ceph.com, >>>>>> describing what you see? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Yehuda >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Georgios Dimitrakakis >>>>>> <giorgis@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It would be nice to see where and how "uploadId" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is being calculated... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> George >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For example if I try to perform the same multipart upload at an >>>>>>>> older >>>>>>>> version ceph version 0.72.2 >>>>>>>> (a913ded2ff138aefb8cb84d347d72164099cfd60) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I can see the upload ID in the apache log as: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "PUT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /test/XXXX.dat?partNumber=25&uploadId=I3yihBFZmHx9CCqtcDjr8d-RhgfX8NW >>>>>>>> HTTP/1.1" 200 - "-" "aws-sdk-nodejs/2.0.29 linux/v0.10.33" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> but when I try the same at ceph version 0.80.7 >>>>>>>> (6c0127fcb58008793d3c8b62d925bc91963672a3) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I get the following: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> "PUT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> /test/XXXX.dat?partNumber=12&uploadId=2%2Ff9UgnHhdK0VCnMlpT-XA8ttia1HjK36 >>>>>>>> HTTP/1.1" 403 78 "-" "aws-sdk-nodejs/2.0.29 linux/v0.10.33" >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> and my guess is that the "%2F" at the latter is the one that is >>>>>>>> causing the problem and hence the 403 error. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> What do you think??? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Best, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> George >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi all! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I am using AWS SDK JS v.2.0.29 to perform a multipart upload into >>>>>>>>> Radosgw with ceph version 0.80.7 >>>>>>>>> (6c0127fcb58008793d3c8b62d925bc91963672a3) and I am getting a 403 >>>>>>>>> error. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I believe that the id which is send to all requests and has been >>>>>>>>> urlencoded by the aws-sdk-js doesn't match with the one in rados >>>>>>>>> because it's not urlencoded. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is that the case? Can you confirm it? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is there something I can do? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> George >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> ceph-users mailing list >>>>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >>>> >>>> >>>> > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |