Re: a bug of rgw?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"rgw_admin.cc" not "rgw_main.cc" or "rgw_code.cc".

2014-12-04 16:14 GMT+08:00 han vincent <hangzws@xxxxxxxxx>:
> "rgw_admin" not "rgw_main.cc" or "rgw_code.cc".
>
> 2014-12-04 16:02 GMT+08:00 han vincent <hangzws@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>     I am sorry, I have made a mistake. The source file of the code is
>> "rgw_code.cc"
>> instead of "rgw_mian.cc".
>>
>> 2014-12-04 11:13 GMT+08:00 han vincent <hangzws@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>>     hello, every one.
>>>     when I read the source code of ceph of which the version is
>>> 0.80.1. I found that line 1646 in rgw_main.cc wrote as following:
>>>
>>>     uint64_t total_time =  entry.total_time.sec() * 1000000LL *
>>> entry.total_time.usec();
>>>
>>>     I did not understand the meaning of this line of code. I think the
>>> second operation symbol of  “*”  should be changed to
>>> "+". so this line should be "uint64_t total_time =
>>> entry.total_time.sec() * 1000000LL + entry.total_time.usec(); ".
>>>     Is it a bug?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com





[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux