Re: firefly and cache tiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Personally I'd suggest a lot of testing first. Not sure if there are any lingering stability issues, but as far as performance goes in firefly you'll only likely see speed ups with very skewed hot/cold distributions and potentially slow downs in the general case unless you have an extremely fast network and cache tier.

In giant and master, there are a lot of improvements being made to decrease unnecessary cache promotions and blocking.

Mark

On 11/20/2014 03:09 PM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote:
Are cache tiers reliable in firefly if you *aren't* using erasure pools?


Secondary to that - do they give a big boost with regard to read/write
performance for VM images? any real world feedback?

thanks,



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux