Currently Firefly on Debian stable, all updated.
I already tried it with Giant and it's same.
But it's look like I solved it. I change crush tunables to optimal and now it shows the size right. And even when I switch back to default it shows it right.
It's weird, but hopefully it's solved for now.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 03:51:56PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:41 PM, houmles <houmles@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have 2 hosts with 8 2TB drive in each.
> > I want to have 2 replicas between both hosts and then 2 replicas between osds on each host. That way even when I lost one host I still have 2 replicas.
> >
> > Currently I have this ruleset:
> >
> > rule repl {
> > ruleset 5
> > type replicated
> > min_size 1
> > max_size 10
> > step take asterix
> > step choose firstn -2 type osd
> > step emit
> > step take obelix
> > step choose firstn 2 type osd
> > step emit
> > }
> >
> > Which works ok. I have 4 replicas as I want and PGs are distributed perfectly but when I run ceph df I have only 1/2 of my capacity which I should have.
> > In total it's 32TB, 16TB in each host. If there is a 2 replicas on each host it should report around 8TB, right? It's reporting only 4TB in pool which is 1/8 of total capacity.
> > Can anyone tell me what is wrong?
>
> What version are you running? Can you copy-paste the command and
> output, pointing out which bit you think is wrong? There are
> occasionally oddities in the source data that confuse things and I
> think there's new functionality to try and predict the "effective"
> size that might have an issue.
> -Greg
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
