Re: Federated gateways

[Aaron Bassett <aaron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In playing around with this a bit more, I noticed that the two users on the secondary node cant see each others buckets. Is this a problem?

On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Craig Lewis <clewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I see you're running 0.80.5.  Are you using Apache 2.4?  There is a known issue with Apache 2.4 on the primary and replication.  It's fixed, just waiting for the next firefly release.  Although, that causes 40x errors with Apache 2.4, not 500 errors.

It is apache 2.4, but I’m actually running 0.80.7 so I probably have that bug fix?

No, the unreleased 0.80.8 has the fix.

 

 

Have you verified that both system users can read and write to both clusters?  (Just make sure you clean up the writes to the slave cluster).

Yes I can write everywhere and radosgw-agent isn’t getting any 403s like it was earlier when I had mismatched keys. The .us-nh.rgw.buckets.index pool is syncing properly, as are the users. It seems like really the only thing that isn’t syncing is the .zone.rgw.buckets pool.

That's pretty much the same behavior I was seeing with Apache 2.4.

Try downgrading the primary cluster to Apache 2.2.  In my testing, the secondary cluster could run 2.2 or 2.4.

Do you have a link to that bug#? I want to see if it gives me any clues. 

Aaron 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com